511 karma · joined February 22, 2013
Doesn't seem to be working with Guantanamo. Or invading other countries.
Obama was supposed to reverse Bush's policies. Instead he enhanced them. It doesn't matter who you vote for. The gerrymandering, the first past the post voting system, the electoral college, the two-party system, the two-party media, all the special interest groups, the corporations, the bribing, I mean, the campaign contributions... The system is fundamentally broken.
Democracy doesn't scale. I doubt a country as big as the United States will ever be truly democratic.
Correction. What the NSA is up to. So far nothing has changed. The Utah data center is still up. Another massive data center is being built in Maryland. May I remind you, these are for content, not metadata [1]. There are no limits to their spying.
Everybody's looking for technology solutions but so far nothing has changed politically. And with the way things are going, it never will because the power and blackmail potential of these agencies are just too great.
[1]: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/government_programs-july-dec1... (skip to 3:50)
* Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media [1]
* How Covert Agents Infiltrate The Internet To Manipulate, Deceive, And Destroy Reputations [2]
Poul-Henning Kamp, in a hypothetical talk about his work at the NSA, talks about just this. [3] Here's a quote:
> The idea is to steer discussions in these forums to or from particular topics (...) and disrupt consensus building against our purposes
[1]: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-ope...
[2]: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipula...
Indeed. The definition of the DRY principle [1] is:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
and not:
Don't type the same characters into the keyboard multiple times.
People often forget that.
Proof:
* NSA Collects ‘Word for Word’ Every Domestic Communication, Says Former Analyst http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/government_programs-july-dec1...
* NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-recor...
* NSA surveillance program reaches ‘into the past’ to retrieve, replay phone calls http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-su...
* NSA spying flap extends to contents of U.S. phone calls http://www.cnet.com/news/nsa-spying-flap-extends-to-contents...
Vodafone's report says:
> Under s.5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (“ISA”) the Secretary of State may, on an application made by the Security Service, the Intelligence Services or GCHQ, issue a warrant in respect of any property so specified or in respect of wireless telegraphy. There is the possibility that this power is broad enough to permit government direct access to Vodafone’s network by the Security Services in some instances.
If the possibility exists then you bet GCHQ is using it. Sorry, your own country can listen into your calls :(
Five of the six countries with direct access appear to be Qatar, Greece, Hungary, Ireland and, not surprisingly, the UK.
Today's revelation is that the NSA records and stores 100% of the phone calls made in the Bahamas.
The Post's revelation was that the NSA records and stores 100% of the phone calls made in an unnamed country.
These two countries are distinct. Read the actual article we're discussing.
I'll quote:
> In March, The Washington Post revealed that the NSA had developed the capability to record and store an entire nation’s phone traffic for 30 days.
(...)
> The Intercept has confirmed that as of 2013, the NSA was actively using MYSTIC to gather cell-phone metadata in five countries, and was intercepting voice data in two of them. Documents show that the NSA has been generating intelligence reports from MYSTIC surveillance in the Bahamas, Mexico, Kenya, the Philippines, and one other country, which The Intercept is not naming in response to specific, credible concerns that doing so could lead to increased violence.
Still missing today's revelation though.
Here's a quote from a recent interview he gave to the Guardian:
> The move [to create his own journalistic enterprise] was audacious and bold, but when I raise it with him he's in a surprisingly reflective mood. He's had some feelings, if not of regret, then perhaps of a little guilt at having left the Guardian at a time when the NSA disclosures were still blazing. "I don't want to say betrayal, that's too strong, but a lack of loyalty ..."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/12/glenn-greenwald...
That's beside the point though. What matters are the disclosures. Not who makes them and not the newspaper where they appear. The disclosures are all that matter.
I just wish they fixed a bug where pressing "j" does not mark as read the first post. Kind of annoying. I have to press "k" first, then "j".
I absolutely love it. Unfortunately, I had to give up on using it last week since I had too many feeds to stay on the free version.
I'm now using Digg's Reader and I'm happy so far. Updates more often than (the free version of) The Old Reader too!
The whole playlist is also worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB4D701646DAF0817
I'll just quote the lead:
> The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.
And more recently, GCHQ's JTRIG program. [2]
Again, I'll quote:
> (The core self-identified purposes of JTRIG is to) use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable
[1]: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-ope...
[2]: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipula...
The FBI had access to the Boston bombers phone calls.
* http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/government_programs-july-dec1... (important part at 2:10)
* http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/04/telepho...
I'll quote the slip up of Tim Clemente, a former FBI agent:
> All digital communications are uh uh... There's a way to look at digital communications in the past. And I can't go into detail of how that's done or what's done but I can tell you that no digital communication is secure.
I'm still waiting for the blackmail revelations. Though I doubt NSA & friends would be that stupid to make slides about that little objective.
You can't possibly be serious.