1,474 karma · joined July 25, 2017
"It’s really just junk science to consider something like this," Jennifer Lynch, general counsel at civil liberties nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation, tells WIRED. Running facial recognition with unreliable inputs, like an algorithmically generated face, is more likely to misidentify a suspect than provide law enforcement with a useful lead, she argues. "There’s no real evidence that Parabon can accurately produce a face in the first place," Lynch says. "It’s very dangerous, because it puts people at risk of being a suspect for a crime they didn’t commit."
tl;dr:
* New technology should not be used to shorten the lifespan of a product
* New technology should not be used as an excuse to inhibit repairability
* New technology should not be tied to unnecessary services
* New technology should not be detrimental to the planet
https://youtu.be/eK0md9tQ1KY?si=3GJx7l70SupDHmTl
In it, she clearly underlines how replacing the term “AI” with “automation” quickly opens up a whole host of useful questions: including what’s being automated, who’s automating it and why, and who’s impacted or harmed by that automation.
A sincere "thank you" to all the determined Hobbits, Elves, Dwarves and Ents helping to keep the TOR network up and running.
"Mission: To advance human rights and freedoms by creating and deploying free and open source anonymity and privacy technologies, supporting their unrestricted availability and use, and furthering their scientific and popular understanding."
https://theintercept.com/2023/10/27/elon-musk-twitter-purchase/
This recent PBS Frontline episode was also quite good: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/elon-musks-twitter-takeover/(I am Jack's utter lack of surprise.)
Cost-effective propaganda at scale... keep your shields up.
Delayism, deflection and doomerism are some of the tactics that have replaced outright denial of climate change, says high-profile climate scientist Michael Mann. Carbon polluters delay action — either by suggesting that there’s still time or that the planet is already past the point of no return — or try to place responsibility on the individual, Mann explains. “Ironically, that framing helps the fossil fuel industry even more because it plays to this notion on the right that climate action is about controlling people’s lifestyles.”
Maybe a better name would be "GIGO"
https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/teleabsence-1/overview/
[edit: added link]
I bailed on the twit site when Muskrat's purchase agreement finally went through. Saw the writing on the wall and was already gone-deleted by the time he carried his sink into the lobby.
Took me awhile to find a Fediverse instance that jived, but am a happy camper now. Zero ads to scroll past. Postive interactions with people I don't really know but who are at least real humans who share mostly interesting things. Unwanted bots and agenda crap are easily muted. Posts can be set for auto-deletion which is a nice featire and comes with the same tweetdeck-style interface so nothing lost there.
Basically I have been enjoying Mastodon and don't find it addictive or outrage-inducing at all. Certainly feels like a more open and mentally healthier "virtual space" than any privately owned and profit-driven ones. So maybe it's just taking time for people to find their way out of Melon's escape room.
"This made me reflect: if there is a section in a grant application that can be written by an AI, does that section really serve any purpose? If a computer can churn out something deeply generic that still answers the question (more or less), why are we asking people to address the question at all? I think the answer is clear: these sections never really did serve a purpose and certainly don’t now."
"I want low-engagement tasks to take up less of my working day, allowing me to do more of what I need to do to thrive (thinking, writing, discussing science with colleagues). And then, because I won’t have a Sisyphean to-do list, I’ll be able to go home earlier — because I’ll have got more of the thinking, writing and discussing done during working hours, rather than having to fit them around the edges."
Got a good chuckle from the Stylus plugin privacy policy:
"Unlike other similar extensions, we don't find you to be all that interesting. Your questionable browsing history should remain between you and the NSA. Stylus collects nothing. Period."
"Laughter is like shock absorbers. Without it you feel every bump in the road."
"[The] thumb-sized two-photon fluorescence microscope... can illuminate and record living tissue at depths that are unattainable with conventional fluorescence microscopes. Weighing just 2.4 grams, the Mini2P can be attached to the head of a mouse and track the activity of hundreds, even thousands, of neurons while the animal runs, climbs and leaps from a platform."
"The Mini2P achieves 'nearly as good' resolution as a bulky bench-top two-photon system. It is also open-source, with parts lists and instructional videos available on GitHub."
[2] https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/reward-sharing...
If the CA Federal Court doesn't squash the subpoena in its entirety, then Snap (and the other 100+ companies) should just say it couldn't identify where all the data is stored across its platform and to do so would take a significant team effort to even be able to answer that question.
Hackers like him, he said, are not interested in weaponizing the weaknesses they find. "The reason you pop open the machine is to learn the vulnerabilities" of each machine, in order to safeguard democracy, he added.
Right on, Harri.
Oh wait, there is...