3,810 karma · joined June 7, 2019
It blows my mind that I never made this connection before.
> But when people talk about autism they talk as if it were a gradient, not a spectrum at all.
Would be funny to create an elaborate system of notification tones that are only discernible by a trained musician
Not to be confused with Apple's Secure Enclave, which is also chip-related. They could have picked a more unique name I think.
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2024/09/sextortion-scams-now-inc...
Separately I've not heard of Adelie Linux and from a quick glance at their site I can't really tell what niche they're trying to fill. I gather they use musl and (before this post) openRC, and they aim for POSIX compatibility for legacy systems.
Is this really necessary to call out? Why discourage candidates from applying?
There are many degrees of being able or not able to play any given song.
This is what I hear when someone says they are practicing a skill slightly beyond their current capacity.
I've started working on my own "power user" RSS reader that lets you weight the keywords you're interested in (so an article that hits important keywords but is older could be displayed above an article that's newer) but it's still closer to a proof-of-concept than a complete app.
When I'm diving into a wholly new subject for the first time, in a field totally unrelated to my field (similar to the author, C programming and security) for example biochemistry or philosophy or any field where I don't have even a basic grounding, I still worry about having subtly-wrong ideas about fundamentals being planted early-on in my learning.
As a programmer I can immediately spot "is this code doing what I asked it to do" but there's no equivalent way to ask "is this introductory framing of an entire field / problem space the way an actual expert would frame it for a beginner" etc.
At the end of the day we've just made the reddit hivemind more eloquent. There's clearly tons of value there but IMHO we still need to be cognizant of the places where bad info can be subtly damaging.
I don’t have an answer for why most music teachers don’t teach theory (and improv) other than it’s more challenging and they might not know it themselves, and it’s easier to teach rote memorization.
There are plenty of people who learn piano (which obviously doesn’t suffer from the single-note “limitation”) and also learn almost no theory.
Surely the optimal solution would be to spend a few hours / days in the first week picking the textbook, then 51 weeks studying it, as opposed to literally picking the first one you see and studying it for 52 weeks.