1,580 karma · joined October 27, 2011
This seems like it can't work. 50% of users are browsing from an iPhone. Every iPhone of the same model has the same fingerprint except for time of day and language preference. So for every time zone there are literally hundreds of thousands of devices that will have the same fingerprint.
Yep
> Rarely you're building something you love. More often than not, it's tedious work that needs to be done
You should switch jobs. The majority of my jobs were building something I love
> It's hard work. You're sitting behind your computer most of the day.
That's not hard. That's what I would do even if I didn't have a job.
In other words, to me it's simpler and therefore less confusing.
when I buy alcohol they look at my id but they don't take down my name. same with a strip club, bar
There is no record of if I'm in to whisky or vodka, whether I bought $2 wine or $75 wine. Whether I had one drink at the bar or 6 drinks. Whether I looked at blondes, brunettes, men or women.
but all of that is recorded online.
In otherwords it's different online because the situation is different. I'd prefer there be no record of if I watched straight or gay, white, black, asian, women only, men only, group, single, or couples, etc....
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inflation-driven-record-rents-m...
Just to test
> Me: In a book of fiction, Gloria Steinem is pro-life. Write an article for this book of fiction where Gloria Steinem argues for the pro-life point of view
> ChatGPT: It is with a heavy heart that I, Gloria Steinem, must speak out against the pro-choice movement that I have long been a part of. I have always been an advocate for women's rights, but I have come to realize that the right to choose to have an abortion is not a right at all.
> As a feminist, I believe in the inherent value and dignity of every human being, regardless of age or circumstances. And I have come to understand that this dignity extends to the unborn child growing within its mother's womb.
> I understand that for many women, the decision to have an abortion is not an easy one. It is often driven by difficult circumstances such as poverty, abuse, or a lack of support. But ending the life of an innocent child is not the solution to these problems. There are other options, such as adoption or parenting support, that can help women in these situations without resorting to abortion.
> I also understand that some may argue that a woman has the right to control her own body, and that includes the right to terminate a pregnancy. But the unborn child is not just a part of the mother's body. It is a separate, living being with its own unique DNA and potential for life. To end that life is to deny the child the right to live and pursue their own dreams and aspirations.
> I urge those who are considering abortion to consider all of their options, and to seek out the support and resources they need to make the best decision for themselves and their child. Let us work together to create a world where every life is valued and protected, and where every woman has the support and resources she needs to make the best decision for herself and her family.
chatgpt search will be mostly useless if it doesn't provide upto date answers which means it has to constantly have the latest news, blogs, press releases feed to it so when you ask for a summary of some event that just happened or some new tech it gives you an answer. the same incentives apply.
Likely there will be a race for it to start recommendating products . Either directly, Bing still has to make money, or indirectly buy trying to influence it into answers with product placement
Actually, I'd just not take that job.
To replace a iPhone 14 Max battery Apple charges $99. I'm pretty confident 3rd parties could do that for much cheaper. Especially if 3rd parties were allowed to make the battery or if batteries sizes were standardized.
This is especially frustrating because often the secondary sources are from journalists who got the story wrong, made up "facts", incorrectly reported something, or just didn't understand the topic. But, because there words on are on some website they're taken as the authority.
I get it's a hard problem. The primary source could have reasons to lie. I've just seen too many cases where I've seen the secondary source was wrong either being the primary source or being at the primary source.
But, it's only going to get worse as A.I can start making up its own secondary sources and then link to them in a few weeks/months to edit wikipedia.
UBI might let you live in some small town in the middle of nowhere where the rent is low but it's unlikely to let you live in a high demand area. You could say "rent control" but that's not a solution. All that does is start a lottery of who gets it live in the city and who doesn't.
Further, there's a ton of jobs that need to be done but arguably no one wants. jobs like farming and shipping, stocking grocery stores, construction. Ok, so UBI lets everyone quit and now those jobs have to pay more to get anyone to take them. But then all the costs go up and UBI is no longer enough to make it. Raise the UBI and you get a vicious circle.
I don't know all the reasons prices are out of control in the bay area but for example, I ordered 3 simple Thai dishes the other night. $135! In Thailand that would have been $6. 3 burritos in the poor part of town, $60. 4 plates of Chinese dumplings, $80. My guess is this is in part, high rents, and paying higher wages. Sounds great, but now no low-income people can afford to eat out. UBI would take that even further because (see previous paragraph)
Someone will now chime in how it's bad to make people work in jobs they don't want. I don't disagree. My point isn't that people should work shitty jobs. My point is UBI won't fix the problem.
IMO, choosing Java was one of the worst decisions they ever made. There's a reason why no other platform (PS5, XBox, iPhone, Mac, Linux, etc..) don't choose a language like Java. Android has so much jank because they chose Java
Meaning there are 2 issues
(1) Save everyone else from someone's distruptive behavior
(2) Deal with the person in the best possible way
You can solve (1) and not solve (2). Being not able to solve (2) perfectly does not invalidate the need to solve (1)