53 karma · joined August 4, 2017
An archive is seldom appreciated until you desperately need it, much as libraries... so you have to be a certain good kind of crazy to do this and preserve digital information like an archeologist instead of paywalling stuff... it preserves our digital history and we should support it in any form we can as noone else is doing it (looking at you national libraries)
But I would argue with the usefulness: this construct allowed flexibility and offered options if rules were not flexible enough to adequately encompass what happened... seen like this it could actually be a boon for devs... or not ;)
http://zettelkasten.danielluedecke.de/en/ has great resources
https://www.zettlr.com/ is new and also useful for a Zettelkasten like setup
Makes you wonder how important most of the video calls really are...
But even there: Luhmann's "Zettelkasten" externalises the main data processing effort back to the users conscious and unconscious references of recorded information, giving back associations not conciously realised before - all with paper cards... would have been another good path not really followed...
And to be fair, most people who lovingly curated special knowledge databases only to see them get used to train machines (without any acknowledgement) discouraged them to continue and resulted in a drop of good training sources (at least in my field and non-english language)...
the woes of the archive, the problems of wrongly categorized stuff, perhaps even due to political reasons (famously Diderot's encyclopedia in the 18th century linked from "eucharistie" to cannibal, showing how political linking can be) are as old as people trying to sort, use and abuse archives - would be great, if some dialogue might have created a middle ground between dumb full text vs semantic search... with some magic AI put over it ;)
*Update:typos