8,824 karma · joined May 15, 2016
> I am thinking that other people may want to have something like that, both for nostalgic reasons and for learning programming, so I thought of asking around and, if enough people like the idea, turn this into a product.
Is a HN post the place for this?
> I don't understand this decision. First the removal of compact mode was motivated because is has bad discoverability. Then community raise its voice to say that not what it wants. And the answer is to make the setting even less discoverable…
> Of course is won't be used if it is less and less discoverable. And this decision break the meaning of doing telemetry on compact mode altogether, how are we going to mesure if people prefer Proton normal vs Proton compact if they don't even have the option showed at all???
> Please keep support on compact mode, don't let it rot and broke
Bingo.
Pledges must reflect the capabilities of a program. Yes the "proc" and "exec" pledge promises are powerful but they can be constrained by their environment such as chroots or calls to unveil.
As an aside if you have very good knowledge of what a pledged program executes you can opt into setting up pledge for it ahead of time in the form of execpromises.
Which ones? I'm genuinely curious about this.
Are there GPUs without FP64 functionality at all? Or are you just referring to most consumer GPUs being built for FP32 performance over FP64?
[1] https://github.com/Battelle/sandsifter