1,030 karma · joined October 29, 2018
Catholics used to attack Evangelicals. You see the Evangelicals had dangerous ideas that had to be eliminate lest the common folk would be lead astray.
People have always been afraid of ideas. This nonreligious religiosity is novel but we've seen this play before.
Adam Neumann the CEO selling dollar bills for fifty cents and hoping to make it up in volume is talking about B players. That's rich.
Then the model simply shifts: 1. Get credit card numbers illegally 2. Create Netflix accounts with those credit cards 3. Sell those accounts on EBay, even after the user reports the card as stolen it will continue to work.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Probably the same way civil asset forfeiture does, somehow precedent became the supreme law of the land as opposed to the constitution.
I once found a confirmed child porn possessing target with a smart home I was able to access. That guy must of thought he was in a black mirror episode.
That is compared to 90,479[3] rape cases outside of prison."[1]
Men are 92% of the prison population[4]
[1]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449454/More-men-ra...
[2]https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=317
[3]https://www.statista.com/statistics/191137/reported-forcible...
[4]https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_gende...
Main stream media as a service
To quote RFC 2181: "Implementations are always free to place an upper bound on any TTL received, and treat any larger values as if they were that upper bound. The TTL specifies a maximum time to live, not a mandatory time to live."
Think of all the times you have heard "That job only pays $x an hour" and the reply "Yeah but the benefits".
This is called performative[0] ignorance, in the world view of the person interacting with you they are a senior person (older, longer time with the company) and you are a junior person (younger, less tenure) so it is their place to assign you tasks. The world has moved on but this whole "I don't know computers" act allows them to preserve their self perceived social status.
In short, to anyone reading this. Now is the time to make your move.
In my case honestness would have made several firms more profitable. I'm a high school drop out but lifelong programmer from a early age. As such I've had to work for well below market rates on my way up. Generally I do better than most of my college educated peers but since I lack the education I have been compensated much less. As a result I leave jobs every year or two, often around the time I'm really hitting my stride and providing significant value to the organization. As I tend to be above the median I end up on the projects that are critical to the company so what you end up with is someone building a quarter of your infrastructure and then leaving because "its corporate policy to max raises out at 5%" or some other nonsense. At that point you have to go back to the market (counter offers when you told me raises are warranted but impossible are an insult and I refuse to accept them) and likely pay at least market rate for a new employee then get him or her up to speed all as deadlines slip.
When I explain this to whomever I'm giving my notice to I am frequently asked "why would I pay you more than I need to" as a retort. I just shrug my shoulders and move on to the next job.
Flat is better than nested
"Do unto others has they would do unto you"
Would the people running the business have you increase their profit margin at great personal cost to yourself? Then it is completely fair for you to likewise attempt to enrich yourself at their expense. I no longer do the work that would be best for the business, I try to find myself in the work that would look best on my resume.
[0]https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizryan/2018/01/25/the-curse-of...
At four servings per pound that is 80 servings at $0.106 each.
Average yield of a rice plant, 10 grams.[1]
9071.85 grams of rice is 907 plants roughly.
That's less than a cent to cultivate, grow, prepare, bag and ship a rice plant. Let alone maintain the store where it is sold and pay the workers who sell it to you.
This is the miracle of the free market.
What price do you suggest is more fair?
[0]https://www.walmart.com/ip/Great-Value-Long-Grain-Enriched-R...