434 karma · joined November 4, 2008
The 2nd still has very little revenue and I would say is still struggling to align with the customer. They've spent many years now developing a product that they think will fit the customer based on their experiences working in the target industry 10 years ago. Its a little scary to watch this company spend their money after only showing a mockup to a customer once, about 3 years ago.
This 2nd company is starting to get paying customers, and then they panic when the customer says, "Wait. It doesn't do x, y, and x? I assumed it did, I mean, everyone in our industry does that! You didn't know that?"
I'm curious to know how these 2 companies would be different had they done solid customer development first.
Also, when they replace their computer in order to "get rid of" their malware, all of their online applications are still there.
I'd never thought of web applications from this perspective before, but it occurs to me that maybe we can thank Microsoft's horrible upgrade path in the early '00s for the large market for online applications today.
I have similar wrist pain that comes and goes, and when it gets bad I just take it easy and make sure to drink a lot of water and that tends to ease the pain.
Also taking over the counter anti-inflammatories can help in the interim period until you gain some wrist strength. I don't take any drugs regularly, and I notice that 2 ibuprofen in the morning usually takes care of it for 24 hours. Obviously you're not going to want to take them every day for a long time :)
Lastly try to pay attention to what you do with your hands when you sleep. If you tend to curl your fingers under your pillow or something it can make the muscles cramp up overnight and make the pain worse.
This is an attractive feature of CouchDB that I'm considering for a web application too.
In the end when dealing person to person, (or business to consumer, b2b, its the same thing) its all just persuasion. Just persuading someone to give you money for something you've persuaded them gives them value. And if you're persuasive enough, they'll agree that it is valuable, convince themselves accordingly and be happy.
Its much more apparent when you convince yourself that you really need very few things in life to get by, and that most of what it takes comes from inside yourself (except for food, water & shelter).
Maybe thats what it is? I don't tell myself that nothing is impossible, I just never admit defeat. I think thats what it takes, just don't even think about giving up or giving in.
Just do it (whatever it is) until you're done. And the move on.
So yeah... you're locking yourself out of Windows. Consider it a smart move :)
I feel like so many folks (me included) in the web development community are constantly re-learning new (old) techniques that we all really should have realized long before now.
Though I don't think I would change a thing as I've learned a lot over the past decade that I probably never would have if it not for this community.
Sometimes I just get a sense of deja vú, like none of this is new...
This whole "Unicorn" business for example. I read about this last week, and thought to myself, "Ok... hasn't Apache been doing this with 2.0 for years?"
So isn't this just re-implementing the wheel... yet again, but in Ruby?
I think the article could be stronger with a few more thoughtful paragraphs on your thoughts, and maybe removing the link (though keeping the name) to your product?
In summary, "Be aware of what you're working on, don't shave yaks, and here is a link to buy our stuff!"
OTOH, I've been using Seaside + Squeak/Pharo for a webapp at work and its been awesome to work with. SqueakNOS is pretty exciting too: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/1762
But my first reaction to Lively (and still is) is, "what for?" I guess I can't get over having an application in the browser that doesn't need a server. In that case a native desktop app. would be much better. I guess its just experimental :)
And if there isn't a server involved... what's the point of using a browser then?
So this is a neat technology exercise... but to what end?
I read a lot of objections to the Kindle stating that you don't own the books. Personally I read a book once and I'm done with it (unless its a programming/reference book). I assume most people are the same way. So why hoard books if you're not going to read them?
The other thing is that "buying" a book for the Kindle is more akin to "renting" the book. You don't own it, Amazon does. You don't own a DVD you're renting from Blockbuster, or Netflix, but I don't hear people complaining about wasting that money.
I also think that if I'm going to read a book more than once, I'm going to buy a hardback version of it and keep it on my bookshelf. If not, then I'll buy/check-out a paperback book and donate/return it when I'm done reading it.
I think there are really two distinct kinds of books, and critics often confuse the two.
(I don't own a Kindle, but have given some thought to it and read up on people's objections)
Later the author states that he believes price to be a factor of convenience (which I would agree with), but that needs to be stated in the intro because I was put off before even getting to the meat of the story.
Or maybe people here would rather read a brief news summary than a paper? Who knows :)
If I remember correctly, pretty much any story with "pyramid scheme" or "ponzi scheme" in the title got massive amount of linkage.