A premature Nobel Peace prize
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
...but Slate ( http://www.slate.com/id/2231909/ ),
the NYT ( http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/world/10nobel.html?_r=1... )
the Telegraph ( http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/b... )
Reuters ( http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE5981JK20091009 )
The Atlantic, the Washington Post, etc., etc., etc. (basically, ALL the media from left to middle to right) are saying that this was an inane decision.
I have to concur.
Probably not what the prize ought to be used for, but if it's effective...
Why use a misleading headline for the hn submission of the report ?
That sounds like the word "premature" to me.