One feature I miss is sync. Something like Firefox Sync would be very useful.
248 karma · joined September 14, 2018
One feature I miss is sync. Something like Firefox Sync would be very useful.
I would like to avoid devolving into an argument about semantics. My original point is that nothing about the original throwaway line is wrong per se or indicates that they do not know what they are talking about. I find these sorts of nit-picks odd.
It is now redundant but that was not the case 10 years ago. People just stick with it since there is little incentive to adapt anything else. WhatsApp just works.
https://old.reddit.com/r/git/comments/59j0yq/gitkraken_is_no...
On top of that GitKraken is closed-source and in the past there were concerns on telemetry collection: https://old.reddit.com/r/git/comments/4dgpgd/gitkraken_data_...
Nothing major, which is why I am still using it, but definitely enough to make you wary.
Twitter naturally "outperforms" all other agencies because it thrives on disaster and outrage porn. Of course you will encounter all kind of alarm bells because that is what gets retweeted. Constantly and year-round. A broken clock may be right twice a day.
>It continues to be a much better source of information than the vast majority of traditional media (and quite a bit better than WashPo IMO, lost a bit of respect for Cal on that one, still respect him a lot though)
I passionately disagree, Twitter is not a better source information. It is merely a firehose of information, which is largely low-grade, easily digestible news that is often incorrect or misrepresented. None of it is vital nor useful. This has nothing to do with following smartly it is about how the website is built. Even if you follow smartly, at best you get an unbiased news aggregator where you might as well go straight to the source. Twitter is instant gratification for news addicts. Everyone wants to be the town herald that gets there first.
Sources on Twitter are also biased, even more so. I rather trust processed and digested news than person X that said Y and shows some shaky video of Z. Best recent example of the disastrous consequences are the comments made by a German official in the Berlin senate (hardly an important position) who went on Twitter to complain about the US holding back masks. That turned out to be incorrect but spread like wildfire and caused an international incident. The "slow" news actually investigated and called him out on it but by then the damage had been done.
Erbfeindschaft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French%E2%80%93German_enmity) is still alive and well in Germany so it's not like there is no awareness of these sentiments anymore. Although under the EU project that has improved a lot in the recent two decades because both the French and Germans found a common enemy in the Brits ha.
Exactly. Also the black characters in Asterix were not "black", they were Numidians or Nubians. They were characters with agency like any other, the Mansion of Gods comic is the best example.
There are a lot of jokes in those that went over my head as a kid.
Agree about the comic book culture, the only people I meet here in the US that have read Belgian comics seem to be other Europeans. But on the other hand, even though I was reading comics voraciously as a kid I knew nothing about DC and Marvel before the comic book movie craze started.
We will see how this entire issue will be treated in a year. I presume that even if it still prevalent, it will normalize in the eyes of the public and everyone will move on with their lives. And that point we will also have corrected and more accurate numbers and statistics, just like with every other outbreak.
Exactly. I wonder what would have happened if this entire virus was treated similarly to the seasonal flu.
Maybe the perspective is also a bit skewed because people that post online often tend towards the paranoid and fearful type (somewhat of a conjecture), so there might be a self-perpetuating bias. Users that are not concerned do not bother to post so everyone just reads panicky posts.
I honestly cannot really think of one. For example, conferences organized by ACM still cost an enormous amount of money to just attend and largely break even by accepting company donations. The grants there are also largely provided by companies.
This is merely an impression by me though, so take it with a grain of salt.
If you already have a certain mindset you are going to dismiss evidence to the contrary, too. You may just be confirming your opinion by only acknowledging positive samples. For example, you may not even know about the subset about psychedelic users who are perfectly normal and "un-hippy" because they do not tell you about their drug use. Likely, if you observe habitual and open drug-use you may also encounter a specific personality type.
>when neither the people writing the articles, nor those reading them probably know very many people with any experience.
I also would dispute that, drug use in the US is not that uncommon, especially under millenials and university graduates. So it is quite likely that both readers and authors are familiar with psychedelics.
Regarding heirlooms, they were introduced in WotLK:
"Heirlooms that increase experience and scale based on character level were introduced in the Wrath of the Lich King expansion."
The line is blurry, but I believe that a trend was definitely noticeable even in late Burning Crusade. In particular, efforts to attract a broader player base. It is unfortunately surprisingly hard to track and timestamp all the controversial changes introduced to the game.
[0] https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Character_Transfer
[1] https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Faction_Change_service
Overall, I would say consumers' privacy-sensitivity in Europe expresses itself largely in the increased usage of Telegram, Tor, Firefox, and Linux compared to the US.