Also, the website could be really ugly or offensive, which could scare off a potential impulse buy.
330 karma · joined April 15, 2008
Also, the website could be really ugly or offensive, which could scare off a potential impulse buy.
There's a whole cognitive aspect to newspapers that Seth is deliberately ignoring. Maybe it's nostalgia, but still. That's what I'll miss.
When I told my piano teacher that I was going to school for engineering and got into the pre-med program (as opposed to music), she was in total shock and her immediate response was, "wait... are you smart?"
IT professionals I've worked with do this kind of stuff all the time to keep employees from breaking stuff until it's shown that the employees can handle the added functionality.
As it is, my own guess is that facebook's business plan involves selling the personal information of its members. This would be the most obvious commodity and also the most obvious reason why facebook wouldn't want to talk about their business plans.
At best, it'll become like opening zips and exe files. Users will have to become aware of the potential dangers, but the practice of providing the files will remain.
Is there an existing community that's working the way you want it to? It might make more sense to start regionally and build from there a la Craigslist or Facebook.
Maybe I'm old school, but for me, there actually is something appealing about expressing a thought in more than 140 characters and specifically to a person of my choosing. I'm Web 1.0 like that.
If I were to apply the broken windows theory online, I'd consider "bad" comments as graffiti and "good" comments as public art. The broken windows would be more an analogy of a community misusing what's been made available to them as opposed to a designer purposely or accidentally creating something ugly.
Flickr? Craigslist?
To create something game changing you have to be like apple, you just build interesting stuff and test it on users until you find something that works and then you release it to everyone.
How will we know if it works if you don't listen to the users? Quantitative information always benefits from qualitative feedback. It's really not enough to know what's successful if we can't tell how or why it's successful.
Also, the advice from almost anybody creating new and interesting products is to place yourself in the shoes of the user and build things that you yourself would find useful. Who should we be listening to then?
And just as there are dodgy accountants, there will be dodgy SEO/Social Media consultants. The key with good leadership in a company is being able to identify what's what.
Numbers: http://www.grokdotcom.com/2008/09/22/top-10-online-retailers...