I don't know of any major (or medium) startup whose success had anything to do with appearing on Hacker News.
140 karma · joined April 27, 2010
I don't know of any major (or medium) startup whose success had anything to do with appearing on Hacker News.
(Let the politically correct downvoting begin...)
You'll find out that a well designed F16 interface also uses modes. You don't want to "launch missiles" and "adjust height" in the same menu.
Oh, and the "expert interface" par excellence, Vim, also uses modes..
Nobody said anything about the "world ending".
And a few overvalued companies "getting through corrections or failures" has different effects than a whole lot of overvalued companies getting through corrections or failures. The second case is called a "bubble burst".
No, because of a design tradeoff: ease of use and mind vs openess.
Apple would still get to sell their iOS devices and iTunes content even if they allowed shell access and arbitrary installation of programs on them.
>I believe with 60% probability that by the end of 2015, Apple won't sell any consumer-targeted products that allow root access or installation of arbitrary software.
2015? Not a chance. Although the industry WILL move towards more auto-managable OSs...
Superficial much?
Em, the "other Apple products" mentioned were never open to begin with. And they are not general purpose computers.
The Mac, on the other hand, always had XCode built-in. I don't see a "closed computer" in the near future...
OK, then. When the web 1.0 bubble burst in 1999, a whole lot of people lost their money. Bullshit valuations make the stock exchange a snake-oil market.
Gee, I don't know. Maybe it has something to do with the government giving away 700 billion dollars to financial companies burned by rampant bullshit fantasy valuations...
b) Really? You have never heard of a programming culture, and how that could differ in Mac vs Windows vs UNIX programmers?
That you want "not to hide important information and high performance features" does not imply the interface has to be poorly designed. A well designed interface can accomplish both.
Most interfaces "designed for experts" are poorly designed crap --and make the work of the "experts" needlessly hard. That some swear by them is mostly "Stockholm Syndrome" (or it gives them a false sense of accomplishment to use something so badly designed, er, I mean "designed for experts".
Well, a typical Mac developer wouldn't touch that with a 100-mile pole...
Which, even if praised by whoring critics, are all quite bad , formulaic, shit.
They aren't gonna be near (random selection of quality stuff): Citizen Kane, On the Waterfront, Arsenic and Old Lace, Apocalypse Now, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Vertigo et al in any cinephiles list...
(c) Actually, you can get the WebKit code and build it, and you'll have a WebKit browser to run. I've done it. Don't know what you are talking about. Did you expect the whole code for Safari? They sure give enough Webkit source for Google, Nokia, the GTK people et al to build a full featured browser upon...
2) "Also, it is quite clear to everyone involved that the reason that they are actively developing Clang/LLVM is so that they can avoid gcc 4.3+, when it went GPLv3."
Actually, it is not at all "clear". They started using it way back in 2005. Actually they wanted a better, faster, more flexible and dynamic compiler infrastructure, and LLVM provided that. And they use it for other stuff too, from graphics code to MacRuby.
3) "since then, Apple's Xcode compiler has rapidly slipped out of date, and now they are forced to take over development of a BSD project just to stay competitive".
Actually Apple had made huge improvements to XCode's compiler in XCode 3, even adding several new features to the core Objective-C language, and also made a HUGE improvement to the overall IDE and compiler (new static analyzer, new debugger, AST-based syntax assistance and code completion etc) with XCode 4 (currently in public beta 5).
4) despite Apple's claims, Clang/LLVM is still very very far behind GCC in terms of correctness and compliance
Bzzz, wrong.
5) (certainly with recent specifications, like C++0x)
Which are not even standard yet, and noone cares about while actually SHIPPING code.
Whatever man...
Isn't this a stock phrase in EVERY and ANY telemarking ad?
Conveniently, in order to "try it" you have to buy his book to find out what "it" is, in which case he already haves your money --and unlike telemarketing there is no refund policy...
It shocked WHO? Who are you (or I) to judge another persons personal life in matters such as that?
Actually, that one could judge someone in such a way, shocks ME.
(Now, some people consider the two types of "sexist" as the same. Those people are disturbed).
Useless anecdotal evidence follows...