1,311 karma · joined October 4, 2014
NOT having a similar reaction to a third booster would be concerning, but I wonder how much the reaction actually correlates with protection for shots beyond the first.
Does a master list exist of companies that don't use SMS, or allow the user to exclude it? Otherwise it seems like most 2FA is just opening up a much easier attack vector (social engineering a phone number port) vs guessing a long, random, unique password. A password manager with browser plugin (or iCloud Keychain) mostly solves the phishing issue if you stop a second to think on the rare occasions when you need to manually copy/paste because of a weird subdomain or partner domain.
I've been 'about to' set up 2FA for over a decade now, but it always seems like a bad idea.
Edit: Also, who's to say customer service agents won't/don't fallback to sending an SMS reset code even if the account supposedly requires a dongle or app for 2FA.
EDIT: Wow! I guess it's a known thing (glad I didn't imagine it): https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2013/10/26/a...
https://blog.iconfactory.com/2021/04/frenzic-overtime-coming...
"...Though the company removed cocaine from the carbonated concoction over 100 years ago, coca leaves are actually still used to flavor Coke. The soda brand has an exemption with the government allowing them to import coca leaves into a decocanization plant in New Jersey where cocaine is removed so the leaves can be used in Coca-Cola for their natural flavors."
https://www.foodandwine.com/drinks/55-million-worth-cocaine-...
https://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/lotto-winner...
Analysts criticize lack of ports, launch titles, developer support.
Also, Tolstoy's 'War 'n Pieces'.
That said, a page/day via email and using public domain works seem like a better compromise.
So I'm curious how, with regard to deepfake technology, video seems to be well ahead of audio. Is audio deep fake technology simply less interesting to people? Are listeners far more sensitive to voice not being perfect? Is the human input just a lot less helpful in modeling the output with voice vs video (where the initial human input is only slightly more helpful than just synthesizing from text-to-speech)?
Have to say, I'm a bit disappointed with this recipe.
I've mostly switched back to Safari ...so I look forward to getting this option in a decade or so.
In all seriousness, this would naturally fit into the new Safari "Websites" permissions in Settings. Right now cookies, databases, HSTS policy, and local storage are still in the old "Manage Website Data..." window, which would seem redundant now.
I'm surprised this isn't a standard feature built into browsers. Seems like it would be obvious to have a level of granularity between accept all first-party cookies and accept none.
Edit: to clarify, I don't think setting cookies is the issue (and not worth the UX hassle to ask everytime); the issue is storing the cookies for longer than the interaction persists. To me, it's analogous to someone remembering who you are during a conversation vs adding you to their rolodex and storing that info indefinitely.
It was about half the price of other places at the time. I was fully prepared to be disappointed, but it was excellent — and had a full kitchen, which helped because food in Iceland is insanely expensive ($20 for an 'authentic' Icelandic hot dog at an outdoor stand is real ). Groceries were only(!) about 20% more than New York (still high, but not unreasonable for a remote island).
Also, I think Iceland is missing an oppertunity to export high-quality room-darkening blinds. Vampire-approved.
Then I hit the "configuring macOS" forever bug after the second install attempt (just force reboot).
I think both of these installer bugs have been addressed in the recent supplemental update to 10.15.0 for any downloads going forward. Despite all these issues, things have been fine actually running Catalina, but I'd wait a few point releases if I did it again. The whole thing 'feels' very fragile, for lack of a better word — mostly due to the online conversation about it.
I'm definitely leaving my home theater Mac Mini on 10.14 for the foreseeable future after reading about the HDMI issues.
Something you have.
Something you are.
Something you nose.
Now they pass the time counting their money until their stars burn out.
I use it mainly for audio streaming from my phone to my MacMini / Stereo, and sometimes to play Alto's Adventure on a projector.
Or, if your Mac is compatible, just try Sidecar. There's a hack to make it work on older Macs, but I think officially it's tied to the ones that have hardware HEVC/h.265 support. http://osxdaily.com/2019/10/11/sidecar-compatible-mac-ipad-l...