I was terrified of an eyeball injection
ctrl.blog
ctrl.blog
Don't postpone eye injections because of fear: if it is indicated, there is usually some degree of emergency.
How are you using the surgical knife in your intravitreal injection procedure?
Any thoughts on how often patients can see the needle? I always thought it was out of the visual axis, but some reports in this thread mention seeing it !?
I'm still impressed by how well those drops worked. And, yeah. All I could see was red (blood), and all I felt was just a prick of something sharp. Was done within probably 10-15 minutes.
Overall, it was kinda like going to the dentist, but I could keep chatting with the doctor through the whole thing. The ability to keep communicating was great for keeping things chill. (However, one must be careful not to laugh while there's a scalpel near one's eye.)
https://www.healthline.com/health/eyelash-mites
Keep any tea tree oil product well away from the eyelashes. It's not actually necessary to treat it there, and you'll regret it if you get any of the product in your eyes.
After reducing my monitor brightness, the problem went away.
An attendant had to force the eyelid down while the stye was lanced with a scalpel.
For some reason, the anaesthetic didn't take effect.
Pain.
But this question helped me clarify my thoughts around this more. It’s the distinction between rational fear vs irrational fear. Assuming clean water the fear of opening your eyes underwater is irrational, it’s not going to hurt you or do any long term damage. The example from the story about getting an injection on your eye is maybe someplace in between, needle in the eye is much more invasive, but also deemed medically necessary where the risk of not doing it is greater than the risk of doing it.
Not having the ability to override your own emotions in cases where they are irrational is interesting to me. It’s like giving agency to an “external other” that you have no control over.
I don't think not opening my eyes under water is THAT irrational, really. My reason for keeping my eyes closed (my fear and not liking the feeling of water touching my eyes) is greater than my need to open my eyes under water (which has been no real reason so far).
I think another perspective that might be helpful is to think of this in terms of the flinch reflex. Anyone can control theirs (this is an emotional process, sure), but the difficulty involves how sensitive they are, how strong the input is, how necessary they deem the action, and how afraid they are of potential consequences. Again, I don't think 'rational' or 'irrational' comes into play here or explains anything extra, I think in your case for example you are probably not jumpy (overly sensitive), and confident that your outcomes will be acceptable. I think the author was probably a little jumpy and was not confident in the outcome of an eye-poke.
I have joked with my friends and family about giving them a limited power of attorney that in the case of eye or testicular surgery they can dose me with tranquilizers or anti anxiety meds without my knowledge and deliver me to the surgeon, having not told me that my surgery is today.
They’re not sure if I’m kidding, and neither am I.
If you're anxious enough already, then: Don't. Ever. Do. This. Videos don't help, at all. And your brain is constantly thinking about ways things might have gone wrong, while simultaneously looking (no pun) for comments from people explaining how exactly things went wrong for them!
They didn't. They said don't postpone your treatment and suffer irreversible vision loss, due to fear.
I went from nervous with fairly intense physical symptoms to being totally chill.
The feeling you're describing is literally panic from an anxiety disorder. If it it's interfering with your adult responsibilities (like going to the doctor), that's the right time to use medication to get through it.
Although I will say having my eyes immobilized also sounds scary. And I feel like I would constantly be "checking" that I still can't move them.
I'm profoundly grateful for modern medical technology, as I would otherwise likely be blind in both eyes.
An eye flinch is exactly what happened to me when I got my latest injection of VEGF-inhibitor to counteract macular degeneration due to 20+ years of diabetes. It was no big thing, just a little disconcerting.
Better than the alternative.
The best advice for me personally is probably to breath deeply and try to relax.
Milk? That’s just cow blood that goes through one weird sweat gland. Honey? That’s bee vomit.
The first time, it took 30 minutes to get them in.
For the first few months, I really struggled. Eventually it got easier, and in a short time I could put them in first time, every time
We're taught from a young age to not put things in our eyes, and it does take time to overcome that. The thought of it might be extremely traumatic now, but if you did it every day, you'd find that disappearing quickly.
I don't think we're really "taught" this, but is jut part of our innate programming. I never taught my cat anything, and I'm fairly sure if I were to put anything in her eye she would be less than happy about that, even if it doesn't hurt her.
I certainly never recall my mother telling me off for putting things in my eyes.
Of course this is not how I talk to my patients... I usually explain the cataract surgery procedure as follows : "the only thing you will feel is water on the side of your face, and the only thing you will see is a very powerful light. You won't see anything scary and you won't feel any pain. We will talk during the surgery and when it will be over, you will tell me that you shouldn't have been afraid". And that's how it goes.
The eye injection procedure is even faster and painless.
Sorry for the gruesome details I gave.
Also, yes, don't look any Youtube videos, because your experience will be totally different than watching the procedure. Youtube videos are scary.
My own experience. I had to do an examination of my nose and throat with a camera on a stick (don't know the exact terminology). The doctor wanted to tell me something and I couldn't react because I couldn't turn the head to lipread and finally I tried to tear out the stick out of my nose and I struggled with the doctor and got a heavy slap on my hand.
The experience was entirely painless, tooth cleaning at the dentist is more uncomfortable.
Don't act like you don't take a chance on every medical procedure. Most of the times it's OK, but sometimes it's not. Then what?
Whether or not that is correct..it’s hard to overcome something like that
If you have a good ophthalmologist, nowadays there is little reason to fear getting injections in your eyes.
Whats good vs. bad?
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/managing/managing-blood-sugar/a...
Based on stories I've heard from emotionally immature doctor friends and my own experience being a little more confrontational with my doctors, he most likely didn't know the answers to your questions and was too proud to say, "I don't know."
It seems many forget that, at the end of the day, doctors are people, too, with just as many flaws and emotions as the rest of us. It's unfortunate that this affects quality of care, but it's a fact of life in every industry.
The best thing you can do for yourself in such a situation is to prepare yourself before appointments and remember the humanity of doctors during appointments. If your doctor is being dodgy about answering questions, let them know that it's okay if they don't know and that you won't think anything less of them for it. If it's an urgent matter, suggest looking it up together so that your doctor can provide context for whatever research you manage to find.
A doctor is like a contractor you've hired to inspect and maintain your body. As with any contractor, if you want them to do a good job, you have to work with them, as a team.
Bedside manner of the doctors and technicians is the most important aspect of it. I have a Doc who wonderfully calm and hires a pretty good staff.
One thing the writer doesn't mention is how long all this takes. For me it's usually 2 hours of my time. I go in, get my eye scanned, then dilation drops are applied, then I wait 45 minutes for them to kick in. After that they, bring me back into a room and start applying various things to my eye: antihistamine drops, numbing agent, something to sterilize my eye, and an antibiotic (I think). All the eye prep takes 20 minutes or so. Then the doc steps in to do his thing, and that takes all of 5-10 minutes.
For those curious, you don't see the needle, you end up looking toward the bridge of your nose and the doc comes from the opposite direction. You don't see it inside your eyeball either. You do see the fluid stream in and it dissipates quickly. If there is a bubble in the solution you end up with one or a few black dots floating around your vision, those dissipate in a day or two. You don't feel anything other than a little pressure on your eye. Afterward, you might have some eye pain. This depends on how good of a stick it was and how your allergies are doing. Sometimes you are relatively pain free afterward, but other times it feels like your eye got walloped and your eye will be sore for a few days.
1. Put me under
2. Disconnect the muscles from the back of the eye sockets and reconnect them temporarily in a better location
3. Wake me up and make sure the locations are correct
4. Push the eyes to the side and reach in with a tool to permanently attach the muscles
The doctor was telling me the last part and I was staring at her like she was insane; "wait.. while I'm awake?!?". My plan is to just schedule a psychological appointment for later the same day.
Apparently yes:
After surgery, there are some simple interventions, like wearing a patch covering your 'good' eye the majority of the time, so that your other eye gets wired in more. However, they recommend against this if the eye is unlikely to gain much function.
Also, do note that, unless you had stereoscopic vision before age 3, almost all specialists believe you can never gain stereoscopy, but you can probably regain some function. (There are signs that VR headsets can help people or regain stereoscopy, in some cases. [2])
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6389657/ [2] https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/ist/ei/2018/000020...
Personal anecdote: I purchased myself a Valve Index ~2 months ago, and have noticed changes in my visual perception after use including limited stereoscopy and general improvements in my binocular fusion (as I said above, my left eye mostly provides limited peripheral vision - but following a VR session I will see my field of view expand on the left side and more of that eye is now being used). At 30 years old this is something I never would have believed possible, especially given it never happened following my two surgeries when I was younger.
Do I think VR is going to restore my limited binocular function to what it would otherwise be at my age? Not with my corrected vision in my left eye being so much worse than my right, full binocular fusion just isn't going to happen (I can force it and it gives me a migraine within minutes).
Do I think there's more than "signs" that it can help people with less severe gaps between their corrected vision (re)gain full binocular fusion and stereoscopy though? If I can see improvements I have no doubt that somebody with a less severe case can get back what they should have had in the first place.
Holy hell, NOPE. I'm very glad I was under the whole time when I had my strabismus surgeries as a child, because I'm pretty sure I would be psychologically scarred for life.
Going in, I'd imagined the best possible outcome. This, of course, didn't bear much relationship to what followed.
No doubt some people would have steeled themselves first given more information. (And perhaps been more stoic!)
One of the advantages of giving details is that it builds a bit of a trust relationship with the doctor.
Around 2.5 million ocular injections are performed a year in the US and the busiest retina specialists perform as many as 50 per day.[1]
As many as 11 million people in the United States have some form of age-related macular degeneration. This number is expected to double to nearly 22 million by 2050.
Many patients require periodic injections for the rest of their lives
https://assets.bmctoday.net/retinatoday/pdfs/0520rt_AMD_MacC...
To this day anything that messes with my eyes freaks me out. That little puffer thing at the eye doctor? That thing is my nemesis. I won't wear contacts. Lasik is out of the question because on top of this phobia I also have CP and I get super spastic when stressed.
Having to get monthly injections in my eyeball would be pure nightmare fuel for me. I'm not sure which I'd fear more, that, or going blind.
That worked out exactly like you are probably thinking. Fortunately there doesn't seem to be a resulting phobia, 11 years on.
I tried contacts many years ago, and after two months of struggling, it still took me over an hour every day to get them in, so I gave up on that.
I still remember the day I first heard about Radial Keratotomy in the 70s. I could not imagine how anybody could consciously allow a scalpel anywhere near their eyeball.
Even today with LASIK/PRK, the whole idea of voluntary eye surgery is just a total nope for me.
I already had some minor surgery with local anesthesic and I didn't have any anxiety, but there's something about having something done to the eyes while fully awake that I find frightening.
For ICL, they'd say things like, "You'll feel a little pinch" before they did something, and I barely noticed that anything was happening.
For Lasik, it was nothing. The most uncomfortable part of the procedure was while they were prepping me, and even that wasn't anything worth talking about unless you have some phobia.
It's been a few years now and I barely remember anything about the procedure beyond the room layouts and remembering thinking it went much easier than I expected.
Unfortunately I have no memory of the procedure itself, so I can't comment on any discomfort or lack thereof. I don't think I was ever told I'd be put under general anesthesia, so it seemed a bit odd at the time to walk in and out with no memory of in-between. Does anyone know if this is a common side effect (or intentional effect) of drugs commonly used during ICL implantation surgery?
I can't even put contact lenses in my eye myself, but getting operated was a breeze. I have been glasses free for 8 yrs now - its great!
I'm very nearsighted (I can't see distant objects clearly without glasses), and I know people's ability to see close objects or read diminishes with age. My plan has been to remain nearsighted in hopes I can always read without glasses. Many people have their far sight improve as they approach 40 or 50.
I've read enough horror stories to know it's not worth the risk, especially when my optometrist told me my vision would worsen anyways in 10 years.
The glasses I was prescribed a few years ago are almost useless today, so I cannot help thinking that LASIK would just correct my vision at a point in time, and then a couple of years later it would be back to glasses. Not worth the risks in the slightest.
I'm not big on the idea of touching my eye but the numbing drops are amazing- after I'd had a couple of eyeball pressure tests I got used to the odd sensation of things touching my eyes without me flinching.
Relevant to the OP it was quite a procedure to experience. I was a little concerned before but it was quite interesting to watch the corneal flat be cut open (with no feeling at all) and peeled back, then see the little laser flashes accompanied by (weirdly) a smell of burned hair. When they dropped the flap back down my vision was instantly corrected, although initially a bit cloudy.
When a cornea flap is cut, you are cutting a lot of innervation to the cornea surface, this for many people means fairly persistent dry-eyes. In addition the scaring of the cornea in the incision flap rim, can also create visual artefacts like Halos, more visible during nightime as your pupil expands and may catch some of the visual distortion of the scar tissue.
I am describing from experience so your mileage may vary. At the end of the day I would probably still go ahead with the surgery but I genuinely feel that it was not thoroughly explained to me, ahead of the surgery, what all the potential side-effects could be.
Thanks for the heads-up, I'll make sure I'm OK with the potential side effects if I go forward with it.
I once had a day at work where the pain was so bad I thought: This is it. I can‘t keep on working, I will lose my job and live on disability from now on.
After some conversations with healthy people, I learned that many can not even imagine dry eye pain. One sentence stuck out: „I didn‘t know eyes could hurt.“
What I wanna say is: Don‘t risk it. Lasik can ruin your life.
I would love to do lasik! But any potential worsening of my dry eyes is not worth it. I would still sacrifice my whole fortune to have healthy eyes again. (to be clear: I did not have lasik, but I probably suffer from permanent isotretinoin damage)
But I was able to reverse a majority of it and continue to do after learning Tribulus upregulates androgen receptors in the brain, which seems to control the aqueous liquid in our eyes.
I'm not sure what Vitamin A does to the body. From a cursory glance, it seems to affect skin androgen receptors, which would explain why it affected your eyes but if it has a similar affect, you might want to consider Tribulus.
Start off with a low dosage. Say 1 pill daily for a week, then taper off. On and off for a few months.
I strongly recommend dissolving an oral pill of hyaluronic acid twice daily -do not swallow the pill whole, it won‘t dissolve and you will shit a tiny gelatine egg.
Besides that eye heating masks and lid-hygiene (e.g. blephacura) do wonders.
As for AR expression, I believe L-Carnitin should also improve it. Creatine should increase DHT.
But I am afraid to haphazardly increase my androgens or receptor expression because of my AGA.
But I’m not sure you understand. My dry eyes are basically gone. And it’s only been a few months. Every time I take the treatment it gets better. Not just that but the lights sensitivity, glares, and migraines are basically down to 10%.
I understand the hesitation however. I hope you continue to improve.
You just take it a week and feel better? I can try that much.
But oral hyaluronic acid should truly be a, no, the first line treatment for dry eye and many eye doctors don‘t even knowing about it is another medical tragedy.
Now, this guy has a dry sense of humor so he said, "You may notice that I'm wearing glasses ..."
And I guess that was all of the input I needed.
<quote>
His eyes are so dry and sore that he puts drops in every half-hour; sometimes they burn “like when you’re chopping onions.” His night vision is so poor that going out after dark is treacherous.But Mr. Ramirez says that as far as his surgeon is concerned, he is a success story.
“My vision is considered 20/20, because I see the A’s, B’s and C’s all the way down the chart,” said Mr. Ramirez. “But I see three A’s, three B’s, three C’s.”
</quote>
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/11/well/lasik-complications-...There's a Facebook group called LASIK Complications Support Group that has 3-4 people joining it daily desperate for help from the pain they're left with. LASIK as an industrial complex has done well to suppress the problems. In 2011 one of the FDA expert advisors who voted to approve LASIK wrote a public letter to FDA asking them to immediately recall LASIK, as he said there was data they were ignoring that they shouldn't have been ignoring, and that it should never have been approved.
A story of suicide post LASIK (actually specifically she did "SMILE") of a news reporter Jessica Starr - many articles on her, but here's two: https://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/families-deal-with-repercussions-a... + https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/in-her-own-words-jessica-st...:
""She looked at me and she said, 'Dan [her husband], it's like my eyes and my brain aren't communicating like they used to. I can't process like I used to. I'm not visualizing things like I used to,'" Dan said.'
My hypothesis is that the more creative and sensitive a person is (therefore less redundancy in neural networks) the more fragile and detrimental damage/injury caused by LASIK.
The cornea is the most sensitive tissue in the body with 300-600 times the density of pain receptors than your skin, and LASIK lies - your cornea doesn't/can't heal on its own.
At least wait until the stromal stem cell treatment available clinically. Human clinical trials in India were fast tracked under compassionate grounds, the original research on animal models from University of Pittsburgh, that were highly successful healing/regenerating deep/severe scarring and chemical burns. It'll likely take anywhere from 2-5 years, with the pandemic delaying things, for it to be available in India/US with FDA approval.
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/w...
- The aforementioned gas bubble
- The same but an oil bubble, when you need the pressure to remain there for longer (and a second surgery to remove it)
- A 1mm bypass stent to reduce intra-ocular pressure
I think laser therapies were avoided in this case because the patient was young.
I have to say, it's not a very pleasant treatment. I vividly remember the image of the needle inside my eyeball and the liquid squeezing in (Avastin has a refractive index slightly different than the vitreos). But at least now I have a cool icebreaker when I get my flu shot every now and then :D
The thing that struck me the most, is that a human eye seems to be pretty puncture tolerant before it starts to leak. Also, the insurance's decision is hard to understand: The injections cost $2k compared to a couple hundred for the eye drops. And once the pellet is in, you can't get it out to reduce the dosage.
I think the touching the eyeball with a cotton swab thing would work. It's not that scary once you've done it a few times. But the thought of an injection does still scare me a bit.
I really fear you.
Well done to the author for not giving up.
This was discussed recently here on HN, but I couldn't find the submission. Here's a link to another story about it: https://jsaulburton.com/2014/07/27/isaac-newton-his-eye-and-...
I had an Avastin injection in my eye 10ish years ago in my mid 20s. It turned out that I had a central retinal vein occlusion which caused me to suddenly lose vision in one of my eyes. There was lots of hemorrhaging and swelling of macula which made me lose vision.
One of the suggested ways to treat some of the swelling was by injecting Avastin into my eyes. The ophthalmologist said that there weren't really anything else to do at that point besides to let the eye naturally heal so I did take the chance to take the shot.
I experienced all of that anxiety that the author wrote about as just the thought of a needle injection into the eye is truly gruesome. But what everyone else on here have said is correct in that, they put all this stuff on you, antibiotic drops, anesthetic drops, and betadine and then they have you look up in the upper right hand or upper left hand corner as they inject into the white of your eye.
I remember this being the excruciating part as once the needle goes in, you shouldn't move your eye at all and keep it in that position or risk blindness (as the ophthalmologist put it). What was seconds seemed like minutes. Due to all the anesthesia, you feel no pain but you do feel this discomfort of pressure as the needle gets inserted into the eye.
Thankfully, I only required just one injection but I knew a lot of other elderly with macular degeneration and such who needed these injections regularly in order to not lose vision. The whole process was pretty professional but I don't know if I would want to go through that all again but I know that if it was between that or lose my vision, I think most people would decide to get the injections.
While I've always had anxiety, it's only become worse over the years given the fear of having issues in both day-to-day blood sugar management and in being diagnosed with long term complications. Living with T1D often feels like a case study in applied stoicism.
Dr Bernstein is a T1D diagnosed back in the '46. He followed the typical diabetes advice and still developed complications to his diabetes. He was an engineer and felt like the biggest problem (at his time) was that diabetics couldn't tell what was happening with their blood sugar so he started doing whatever he could to gain access to a blood sugar monitor (rare and only owned by doctors at the time) and once he got one he started doing what engineers do, testing adjusting and tracking results. He realized that complications from diabetes is entirely caused by blood sugar, and that carbs are the largest thing that affects blood sugar. A low carb high fat/protein diet would have minimal effect on blood sugar levels. He tried to advocate that everyone should follow this diet and also have access to a blood sugar monitor. But the medical industry wouldn't give him any mind, because he's an engineer not a doctor. So this dude went out and became a doctor, and has completely changed the lives of diabetics everywhere thanks to his work.
Anyways, tangent about how awesome this guy is aside. He says if you maintain an A1C of 5.5 you will not suffer the effects of diabetes. The best way to do that, he recommends, is to eat a low carb high fat diet in order to minimize spikes in blood sugar and avoid needing to take excess insulin.
I also follow a low carb diet, which is how I've been able to have good glucose control myself.
Type two diabetes can be reversed with diet, maybe those facing this procedure will get more motivation to try stricter dietary interventions.
I had some systemic inflammation behind my retina that would flare up every year or two, causing my retina to warp and make everything look like a fun-house mirror. (At least with the good eye closed... with both open, the brain sorts it all out and provides a good image...)
To reduce the swelling, I needed steroids shots towards the BACK of the eyeball! Speculum goes in, then the doc puts his thumb on the eyeball and rotates it so that I’m looking into my own brain (it seemed) and injects something... aargh!
Didn’t help they he was 76, had shaky hands, and would say things like “now don’t move or you’ll go blind... haha.”
Not all that painful, though... the anesthetic drops numb everything. But, the most disturbing medical experience I’ve had.
(Of course, I’m a guy... I doubt it’s as disturbing as squeezing a baby out of a small orifice in your groin, so there’s that...)
In the wake of having multiple surgeries myself, I became interested in watching procedures like the one in the article actually being performed. For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQfRKTKmq80 (warning: may be disturbing).
I don't consider myself squeamish, but just try finishing a video of, say, knee-replacement surgery. Imagine carpentry, with someone's living bone. Yikes.
Massive respect for the people who successfully do this every day without being completely overwhelmed by the complexity, the high stakes, and, especially, the cringe-inducing gore.
The doctors who cut biopsies out of your skin don’t seem realize how much you’ll think about there words when you leave. “How long has that been there? That looks a little concerning. That seems strange.”
Doctors have to deal with patients of all kinds of mental fortitude of course, but it wouldn’t hurt to be clearer about procedures, concerns, etc.
For example, tell me “I bias towards taking a biopsy if I have even a little bit of doubt.”
The anxiety is worse than the procedures, by far. I don’t have any helpful advice to give; I just toughed it out. The only bad experience I ever had was during my second transplant. They conduct transplants under conscious sedation plus local anesthesia. The sedative puts you to sleep for a few minutes while they nerve block the side of your face with Novocaine and then they wake you up a little for the procedure. I found the procedure profoundly disturbing psychologically even though I was in no discomfort. They use a trephine (like a small razor sharp cookie cutter) to remove your cornea; you’re awake and can sorta see it. It makes squishy noises. Your vision skews all over and then goes really blurry and you realize that there’s nothing but gravity keeping the insides of your eye in. After that I always asked the anesthesiologist to sedate me just to the point where I was unconscious or at least not aware/lucid.
Most doctors are very caring people and used to addressing anxiety. Maybe not surgeons so much, at least in my experience.
I was freaking out for 6 months about the entire operation. The more research that I did, didn't help. Even support groups that had gone through it didn't help. I was terrified.
The first eye: I took Xanax before the procedure, and they gave me something to calm me down. I was partially aware of life for 10 minutes after I was almost home.
The second eye: I didn't take Xanax, and partway through the procedure I woke up enough to be able to feel them working in my eye. I was calm and not bothered by it. It felt more like a tugging and pulling (like how your foot associates your shoe-laces being tied); but I was calm. The doctor told me to stop moving my eye. They must have given me something more, because I don't remember anything else.
It's an out-patient procedure.
If you are in a similar position and have ANY questions, I'll talk to you about it.
There will be a hundred people who say: "If I can do it, anybody can!" I don't want to be dismissive about your feelings. I was in horrible shape before the procedure.
But I will be honest with you and talk about it if you want.
This author is a king.
If you get the dilation your eye's will look like you are possessed by a ghost, for the rest of the day, and you might scare children ;).
my wife, on the other hand, is a fucking champ when it comes to anything eye related. she has keratoconus[0] and not only she has to do a ton of eye exams every year, but she has to wear rigid contact lenses whenever she's awake.
> it felt soooo bad!
It shouldn't. You are not even supposed to feel them, in fact, some people fall asleep with them even if they know they shouldn't. If you suffered, even if it was your first try, it's probably due to presence of dust between your lens and your eye, and I agree that this is super painful. But that's not the normal sensation, and that's not an issue as long as you remove the lens and retry after some cleaning.
> I did this once, I learned a lot.
Surprisingly that was the most comforting thing I could hear. To know that the ENT had enough confidence and presence-of-mind in his procedure to crack a joke told me I was in good hands, even if those hands were holding a six-inch needle down my throat.
That bring said, I was apprehensive the first time. But you have to trust the doctor and his skills. The injection itself doesn't hurt. There are no pain receptors in that zone. Only a faint prick when the needle pierces the sclera (the white outer skin of the eyeball).
In my case, the doctor explained me before what I had to expect. A sort of cost-benefit analysis: "Bear your anxiety for a few seconds and the disease gets under control". It helps to understand what is at stake. Also, knowing the physiology of the process eases the nerves. If I know there is no nerve ending to feel the pain, I know I will be more relaxed.
Protip: I keep my fist clenched to my belt & gaze fixed to a spot to prevent any accidental movement.
I recently took positive action to try and dispel this fear with a sort of exposure therapy: I started giving blood. It's a much less stressful environment, that feels much more under control. So far I haven't had any issues at all, which is a surprise to me. It hurts a bit when the needle goes in, but my heart does not race, nor do I get a massive hit of adrenaline. I'm on my third donation, and next time I need to have a needle inserted for something else, I hope I'm a lot less troubled by it.
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4cbwvf
[1] Dan Ariely, in the intro of his must-read book "Predictably Irrational"
I find myself having this reaction all too frequently after traumatic encounters with the healthcare system.
I honestly don't know the answer. Do other patients really not communicate when they have a bad experience? Or do they communicate and the system is simply incapable of listening or reacting?
After the operations (first one eye, wait a month, then the other eye) I had to wait six months to be fitted for glasses with "progressive lenses" (having used store-bought reading glasses inbetween) and I was done.
Over the ~10 years since then I've had to have my eyes lasered two times because that pesky cataract tried to grow back otherwise I just have a rather glare-sensitive pair of eyes[0] with a fixed focus length (due to the artificial lenses) making me both far- and near sighted[1] at the same time. Also the glasses are expensive, to the tune of 180-200€ per lens ie. ~400€ without the frame.
TL;DR: it sucks but it's better than the alternative, going blind before or by 20 years old and having seen the difference [2] in the month between my initial two cataract surgeries it's well worth it.
[0]: outside on sunny days w/o sun glasses has me almost constantly blinded if I look anywhere near the sun's direction or any sun-reflecting surface (non-matte metal, glass, wet roads, water surfaces from puddles to the sea or any sufficiently light-colored surface, think paper or white walls etc.); ALSO software/websites that don't have a dark color theme genuinely become straining to my eyes within minutes if not seconds, so take note software engineers and web-devs, dark themes are not some hipster fad but a genuine accessibility feature
[1]: near-sighted from childhood astigmatism (extent: fine details and separations between objects further than ~50-100m become blurry), far-sightedness (extent: without glasses I can't read normal documents nearer than my fully extended arm, visually becoming just black fog/smudges on the white background) from the IOLs (intraocular lenses), IIRC the IOLs were made to make me more far-sighted with the idea that I would get more near-sighted with age anyway to some extent cancelling each other out.
[2]: the not-yet-operated eye couldn't even see a large smokestack ~2-3km away, there was just fog starting at around 1km away, the operated eye could see them perfectly fine on the horizon