"You're absolutely right."
148 karma · joined March 26, 2021
"You're absolutely right."
100%!
I suspect that the number of kids using not using an app on a device that is aware of its locality is a rounding error.
Tesco* phones on some network's family plan must be 95th percentile.
(* other high street retailers are available)
Smart people could apply their skills and build a genuinely useful technology.
But seems they would rather stick their finger in their ears and pretend that it's not happening. And they will be ignored.
WHen did this learned helplessness become so in vogue?
Switzerland isn't in the EU, though.
Kids do.
Sure if they want to circumvent and go home and use Dad's laptop to cyberbully or send pictures of their wang they probably could ...
Token could be signed out-of-band to obscure the interaction between the parties.
It's not beyond the wit of humankind to build a working system.
"To enforce it, platforms must age-check their users. In practice that means anyone opening a new account will likely have to prove they're over 16 by uploading an ID or passing a facial age scan."
> likely
It could, of course, use a double-anonymous system like the French one.
Probably not, but I'd rather that they didn't state their guess as fact in the title.
If you're a regular bookmaker, who is on the hook for any losses, then yes you would ban successful users. But in this case you just skim off a fee for each "trade" so there's no incentive to ban anyone.
Export as read only?
If the answer is blind trust in a third party that runs the messaging service then I suspect that you can guess what the people asking those questions are really asking.
(emphasis mine)
The current Mayor, whilst still a proponent, likely does not use it. A quick glance at the social media that he recieves will tell you why - it would not be safe. He needs to travel with close protection officers.
The reason? He is Muslim, and Britain has become a very racist country indeed. Well, maybe always was, but the likes of Farage and Musk have so emboldened them that there is no longer a stigma.
I can't imagine that it's hurt my job security, and it's been far more interesting than waiting for someone to find me busywork to do.
So long as you're not so incompetent that you're repeatedly doing stupid stuff or cynically causing issues so that you can make yourself look virtuous by owning up, of course.
Only problem is the config - I'd love a simple alternate WG app (for macOS/Windows) that could pull a config from a remote endpoint (checking signing) and bring up a WG tunnel with the config presented.
I've written a Golang client which shows up in the macOS menu bar and handles all this, but it's using the Brew WireGuard command line tools and needs sudo, etc., etc., so it's not really suitable for the average user.
Be sure to allocate me a bunch of shares for giving you the idea.