fersab

Most AI-assisted projects you see today are LLM wrappers, CRUD apps, or a handful of frameworks stitched together with API calls. I wanted to push Claude Code in a different direction — heavy algorithmic work, real-time math, and the kind of low-level graphics programming that takes you back to the demoscene. No frameworks, no crazy abstractions, just pixels and linear algebra.

So much memories! Thank you!

also old!

Man, he STILL, sounds like an angry teenager....

crossfit is like scientology of fitness

Not that you will do it but,

Since you mostly feel "lucky", find the devs or other people who worked their asses off to make this happen and who did not get anything.... and share!

Agree with this. But having said that, an introvert can learn to be much more extroverted and finally become CEO material.

However, with a high-touch product (as mentioned above), you really need to have a lifetime of extroverted experiences which leads you to all the other extroverted (sales people) that will close those deals.

While there is some truth when it comes to elitism etc, my own (hard learned) view regards this subject is, that there simply is somewhat of a "gut-feeling" if you should or should not be raising money. This is not the same as that you "feel a need", i mean everybody always need money. The "should" is usually there when you have sales flowing in and you just need to hire help etc. Many founders already know the answer deep down(and they are good at ignoring it), even before the pitch.

Great job!

However, i would like to point out that the Consulting "climate", in Sweden is very, very good and it is super-easy to find a client. Few searches and groups on linked-in will yield interviews, and there are plenty of brokers that deal with independent contractors.

With that in mind 300k is a nice job still for one guy!

We're all human and overreact, so no worries. I agree Creativity may not be primary always, but it definitely needs space to co-exist with the more logical-perspectives. After all, at some point in time people would not even be creative enough to come up with solutions like TDD etc.

Having said that, to be more OT. I agree with you regards the code coverage. However, the quality of Tests should be raised, as i would rather be in a position where people are aware that stuff can break and be on their toes, then to have false sense of confidence with 100% code coverage using poorly written tests (for example, tests so complex they need testing on their own).

And sometimes, it is more important to get an MVP out there, and collect the users feedback then the actual tests.

My point, its a dynamic world, and it doesn't hurt to listen to each other more!

I totally agree with you on this one! The tone is absolutely immature and frankly disgusting. I would never hire a person with this kind of attitude, frankly because it is the ultimate creativity-killer in a team.

This type of attitude is creating a culture where everyone is "to scared to learn" by being to scared to comment on things, or even to ask a simple question.

So sad to see this...

Aah there that was!

However i'm still impressed by the execution, when you take it all in the acccount, regardsthe lack of tech knowledge and so on...

I'm wondering, and forgive me if I missed this somewhere in the article, but did the founders wanted this type of product for themselves in the first place?

If there was a solution like that before they started, would they go and design their own jeans instantly, cause they really really wanted to do so?

Sounds to me like one of these "that would be cool if, I think"-type of ideas... I may be wrong though?

As others here are saying, finish it up.

I did the dropout thing from MS and it bugs me still to this day. And this is even though i had/have successful startup path in my career...

Massive Attack, Prodigy, Fron Line assembly, Assemblage 23, Covenant, VNV Nation, Front 242, Hallucinogen, Infected Mushroom

something like that...