171 karma · joined February 24, 2017
This is the type of behavior antitrust authorities should enter to break the company in different entities.
Let's say you've been working in place A, you show your code to an LLM service (like the dozen or so Copilot-like services) and tell them to refactor. And for the sake of argument, let's say the LLM uses your code and questions for its next training dataset.
A few years pass, then you go to work at Place B, and ask a question that happens to be related to the problem that Place A's code solved, and they give you Place A's code as is.
For some context in pricing, a battery for a framework laptop cost $59 US (now in discount for 50).
How is this even legal? The youtuber got the packs from the company through a logistical error, didn't sign an NDA or embargo agreement, and gets armed mercenaries at his door for 'leaking' when the company did.
This it's some criminal level of intimidation, something you expect from a gangster or a cyberpunk dystopia where companies bypass the state establishing arbitrary punishment for internal rules you didn't sing on.
I hope this guy lawyer up, and get as much as possible from them.
Why a company with the minimum brand awareness thought this was a good idea, it's still beyond me.
I'll even say that the high bandwidth push in the public was highly related to that. Even HTML5 video players, adult websites were faster to implement it than big streaming websites that still used flash or similar tech.
So as much as I like the product, I find hard for Niantic to replicate the mainstream phenomena they had in 2016. I hope to be wrong, and they surprise with innovate like a AR wearable or a game with better mechanics. Sadly, I think those Layoffs are a reality check of the current state of their games.
Ok, servers are expensive, but Ubisoft manage to recover after some reputation hits (and Blizzard distracting everyone being the main enemy in the public eye for a few months) and then, they do this.
And let's not get started with the potential risk of lawsuits (Buy a single player DLC game, but then you can not play it because someone turn off a switch?).
Maybe falls a little bit under the uncanny valley but with clothes on, I could see this achieving a pretty natural look to a prosthetic, plus this type of design seems more analog to an actual arm in terms of control.
I know that there is a long way for real-life use, and maybe I'm naive because I don't know all the caveats that need to solved to make it feasible, but this type of tech gives always puts a smile on my face.
If you are a wharever-ionaire you could put your gains in index S&P 500 shares, then use them as collateral, paying everything you need with credit and having a $1 annual salary. So technically, that $1 it's their only income to the IRS. But what about interest? with that collateral, you have a special rate close to (or even lower than) inflation. Then you die, the bank takes your shares to pay your debt, and that's it.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/buy-borrow-die-how-rich-america...
From the free speech / CCP fiasco, the hostile workplace for women, the crunch culture, games perceived as irrelevant despite being ground zero of the e-sports, and a lot of great talent just leaving the company. It's sad to look how a company that I enjoy their products for so long, being down to this.
And probably the saddest part it's that a lot of those problems were there from the start, but just recently started to being public.
The only thing that make this not a treat to your regular folk it's the fact that needs a lot of images references to make the model, but imagine a politician or activist, they have a lot of images on the net; So this can take the fake news to another level. Yeah if this happens the news media and legal system, will probably not take shady videos seriously without verification (specially now, that the algorithm it's still is in the middle of the uncanny valley, so for the moment it's easy to recognize without experts need). But think about your friend, uncle or cousin that shares his "echo chamber" posts on facebook?
Or who knows, maybe I should't binge black mirror, and this only gets limited to porn and good uses. Like a new era for stunts in movies.
Probably the best way to fight a bad argument (e. Racism, Sexism, etc) it's not to censorship, but educate and discuss about it, and expose the fallacies in their logic. Censor ideas we don't like, gives them a martyr status. Of course it's hard and requires work, but at the long term freedom of speech it's a great investment for a democratic society.
Edit: After reading more about the changes about CS 2.0, I may give it one more chance, let's see how it work now.
God knows how many BS like this we could save if only people treated stereotypes as such, simple narratives easier to understand when we tell in stories, but aren't truth when applied to individuals in the real complex life we are.
Maybe not a deal breaker for a lot, but for crucial data, my advice will be build a cheap NAS with Linux inside, and pass all data between OSs over network
In my case usually I use it something like this: [youtube/google music/docs][code][browser] or [folders/video files/script/client brief-indications][video editor][preview fullscreen]
I think this it's the kind of stuff that depends a lot on the way some people feel with multitasking, distractions and specially on their nature of the job.
Like the article says, probably writers, spreadsheet people, or even programmers who needs little documentation and makes all the testing in the IDE can benefit from this approach to "focus" only in one monitor.