It should not be X times slower than SQLite.
3,425 karma · joined March 27, 2016
It should not be X times slower than SQLite.
UPD: It's his personal bot.
Something like: "I have been looking for a QA middle role with 2 years of experience for six months. Here is the stuff I won't be doing: relocating to a different city, commuting more than 30 minutes, ...". Most of the comments say, "Good luck. You will definitely find a job". Only a few mention that it's time to update your worldview.
But given the majority of use-cases of CH, AWS can be quite expensive.
I can't recall any other OSS project that makes so much money and has nothing to do with infra/cloud.
They were making around $1M a year back when they complained about the revenue. A lot of Linux distros can only dream about such an amount of money.
Also, changing license does not prevent you from forking the source code before the change. There are no new libraries with kernel level effort that use uncommon license.
Regular CH also support external data sources, so I can read 500GB of JSON from S3 and group by it on production server very fast and in memory.
After using pandas for 10 years, I favor SQL now, for some reason.
I would not call this overfitting, it's finetuning for specific task where you have a benchmark.
BUT, he does not use labels when training, so the model does not know the answers.
Same for a lot of side projects or small contributions to OSS, people are still chasing them and wasting everyone's time for nothing. They wouldn't even work on them before AI.
Cloudflare started to pick Zig recently, for projects, that have memory constraints.
From the article:
> A kiosk that kept dying
> “It’s my device”
> Reality television
> The grind
> The relief pitcher
This is one of the giveaways for me.
Open Router
Input /M $0.45
Output /M $3.20
Cache read /M $0.05
Throughput 27 tps
It would be a very nice model at 200-300 tps and if it was dirt cheap. What's the limiting factor of optimizing speed and price for inference providers?
Right now, they give 4100 credits for Luna and 63 000 for Deepseek on their prepaid plan (both are 2x)
Look at deepseek, they improved it just by doing a lot of RL and you can see it from how it behaves. You provide very little information about a task, but since they are trained on similar tasks, they come up with a lot of assumptions and details on their own, because they were trained with such an info during RL.