https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1700092800&dateRange=custom&...
68 karma · joined January 14, 2020
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1700092800&dateRange=custom&...
This one seems to fit. Happy I've never had reason to write one like it.
awk '{ k = $1; sub("^[^ ]* *", "", $0); d[k] = $0; } END { print d["Title"], "by", d["Artist"]; }'
Personally I'm a bit of a sed fan sed -nE '/^Artist/{N;s/^Artist +(.*)\nTitle +(.*)/\2 by \1/p;}'What a coincidence.
I'm not a card carrying FSF member but that seems like a deliberate omission from the admittedly brief history. However also fairly off-topic as criticisms go.
A maintainer willing to reject contributions is a good sign to me - BDFL with a vision prevents mission creep and associated ills. The right to fork alleviates most of the negatives.
That sounds way too exciting, even without that involved I keep my Windows install on its own disk.
Same here - stub, kernel, initrd and embedded cmdline all in a signed UKI on the ESP. I do encrypt my root however, so I wouldn't go as far as "painless" for the grub->efibootmgr switch (but I also switched initramfs generator so... always keep a rescue stick around).
But it's all about ownership and trust. I control the keys - hence I am the owner of my computer - and I don't trust e.g. Microsoft[1] to not eventually try to fuck me over. But that's not the important part.
> Also, I don't understand where remote attestation entered the conversation here, and I also don't see why that can't be a community based thing (al la let's encrypt is now everyone's CA) where you can choose your providers or even roll it yourself.
Remote attestation is mentioned five times in TFA and is where this can get really pernicious - indirectly limiting user choice because $safety_critical_industry (e.g. banking) only allows "the corporate keys" (likely including a few Linuxes too, but something like Gentoo couldn't be). They'll even have very good and completely valid security reasons for not allowing arbitrary user keys, but they'd lock me down to approved choices remotely. A reverse AGPL if you will.
Of course, workarounds will exist: "just multiboot", "just use multiple devices", "just choose the bank that allows you to whitelist your key" (assuming there is one, it's nice to dream) - but user freedom is reduced without malicious intent being strictly necessary anywhere in the process.
That's focusing on the negatives with my paranoiac hat on, of course.
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/07/lennart_poettering_re...
I'm all in favor of secure boot as long as I can enroll my own keys, but remote attestation gets scary quickly.
That's just as easy with dd, decompress|dd is especially useful:
xzcat linux.img.xz | dd of=/dev/sdb bs=1M
Throw pv in there if you want to.
> here are two ways to create a 100 MB file containing all zeroes
And here's a better way: truncate -s 100m zero.img
For reference, quick iperf3 TCP tests on my APU2 (cpu[0123]: AMD GX-412TC SOC, 998.27 MHz; em[0123] at pci[1234] dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03):
LAN host <-> APU: ~410 Mbps
LAN host <-> APU (over WireGuard): ~140 Mbps
However, I've put em[123] together as a veb(4) switch without pf involvement and two LAN hosts will get almost the full gigabit between them over that. Would need something bigger if I had a faster uplink or more complex LAN requirements.
The Arch wiki might be a bit better and we all benefit from it to some extent, the Gentoo wiki is also good and honestly I don't use either that much anymore.
The great differentiator is portage. I never run into "maintainer built the package without xyz support" - sometimes I'll run into "stupid user disabled xyz support when installing" but that's just a config change and easier to accept since I'm the stupid user. In theory they might've missed adding a USE flag for that feature and I'd have to overlay my own ebuild or live without it. Custom source patching is built in and package versions can be (un)blocked via package.mask/.accept_keywords. Version 4.3 broke something? package.mask: =pkg-category/pkgname-4.3 to downgrade to 4.2 and still automatically get 4.4 when that shows up. Mask >=4.3 instead and nothing will change (but eventually dependencies might force you to fix it, of course).
Compilation is pretty fast on a modern computer. Significantly slower than binary packages sure but it's mostly with browsers and maybe qemu/compilers that you really feel it (and several of those do have binary packages, e.g. www-client/firefox-bin, dev-lang/rust-bin). On my old laptop this turned into an excuse to experiment with distcc and nfs for speedups (Core2Duo with 4GiB RAM is a bit weak for encrypted ZFS + compiling gcc, and also it's fun).
Compilation times is still the strongest con but having compilation as a first-class citizen is what enables most of it and the big stuff you just run in the background.
(For the unaware, do note that "compiling myself" means "emerge pkgname" or "emerge -auvDNU @world" and includes dependency tracking, not "./configure && make" and manually hunting things down.)
I did run Arch for a while around 2010 but it didn't take. It's nice to find a permanent home - I've been on Gentoo since 2013 and an acquaintance has been on Slackware since the 90s.
Those three seems to be where us tinkerers end up.
...and that's a feature. There's nothing wrong with Arch doing its thing, there's always Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora/Manjaro/whatever - and Gentoo for those with taste.
Still, you can check https://man.openbsd.org/pci.4#Wireless_network_interfaces to get a general idea. Unfortunately only a few support host AP mode (last I checked).
Would recommend it, very nice to work with.
However I also believe that's only because they haven't considered the potential impact of constant surveillance from everything you own sent to third parties who will keep the data forever.
...or maybe they just trust faceless strangers more than I do.
And that happens occasionally with Discord, without running make -j42.
- QuakeSpasm-Spiked, modified QuakeSpasm with framerate-independent physics and other improvements: https://triptohell.info/moodles/qss/
- FTE QW, will let you play singleplayer, multiplayer, and I think even Quake II (and III?): https://fte.triptohell.info/
- QuakeSpasm (sibling comment has a link)
If all else fails, I know some QW guys are playing on M1 using ezquake. That's really a multiplayer engine and I wouldn't recommend it for SP but it could do if you're desperate.
I took this as an excuse to try NixOS myself and an opportunity to provide anecdata.
Previous Linux experience: Lots, including about 7 years of Gentoo use, some Arch and the usual distro hopping before that. Mostly on laptops (not counting VMs). Lately it's mostly been the BSDs so I'm a little lost.
It took me about 45 minutes from searching for their site to have a working XFCE install using their minimal install ISO with VirtualBox. Certainly a different experience, but with their install guide and searching "nixos xfce" you'll get it done.
Promptly rebooted and went for an encrypted ZFS root - less straightforward but after a few PEBKAC snags I got it up in an hour or two.
My immediate impression is that this is great but not being allowed to just
# which zsh >> /etc/shells
rubbed me the wrong way. Definitely something I'll consider using in the future, seems like a good fit for i.e. a VPS you might want to move easily.Naturally I haven't learned the config language fully, but it seems easy enough if the docs aren't terrible.
OpenMW is great, played it a lot a couple of years ago. I love when games get future-proofed like this. See also the various Quake and DOOM source ports, although those started from id Software releasing their engines under the GPL so had an easier start.
ps --libxo json
and get json output, or xml/htmlRiot Games' anti-cheat Vanguard (for LoL and Valorant) loads early during boot, requires a reboot after installing and if I recall correctly they now allow unloading it (because who wants to do banking with a rootkit loaded) but then require a reboot before playing again.
https://win.gg/news/8115/is-ai-the-future-of-csgo's-anti-che...
Essential only -> Processing please wait (but you can cancel)
Customize -> Trying to trick me into allowing more, then processing as above
Accept -> Instant success
Took some screenshots since this is ridiculous (I may just not be used to the modern web since I aggressively block scripts): https://imgur.com/a/fJB0aHz
My favorite part is having to pull a bar up to decrease my consent-level.
"LibreSSL with Bob Beck" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnBbhXBDmwU