1,188 karma · joined December 29, 2014
``` Here is an example of Python code that can print a loading bar at different completion percentages:
def print_loading_bar(percent): bar_length = 20 hashes = '#' * int(percent * bar_length / 100) spaces = ' ' * (bar_length - len(hashes)) print(f'\rLoading... [{hashes}{spaces}] {percent}%', end='')
for i in range(101): print_loading_bar(i) time.sleep(0.1) ```
I will add that the quality also highly depends on when you go. Generally, the busier it is, the worse the quality.
The author states that Joe's is one of the better ones, but I think the quality has gone down too. I was there in 2014, 2017, and 2022. Digging up my photos to review the sauce amounts, but I felt 2022 was very lackluster to previous memories.
Only thing that ruffled my feathers at the end as a MA resident was the solution being additional personnel to monitor a non-problem.
If the journalists or whomever wants to claim the DSID is leaky, then they need to show a POC with an app actually obtaining that DSID, and not only in a system logger that only saves files sandboxed locally, or sends to Apple.
I don't think there's anything wrong in transmitting an ID to a web service, but I'm not actually sure what Apple claimed about privacy.
Android/Pixel safety features: https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/7055029?hl=en
I'm not saying they do have those issues, but how do you know they don't? You can't compare a released product to a marketing ad.
Edit: Looks like they added a python argument to increase the limit. So if you really need this, I suppose you can search around until you figure out why it's not working and pass the correct argument to the python bin.
In a simple form it seems like this: The attack is you have a briefcase that contains specific RF transceiving components in it. You turn the brief case on in a hidden place, leave it, it records data, you come back to it later, and then press a button(s) that replays those RF signals.
Perhaps, there's some very weak cars that don't even need a replay, but are vulnerable to a master key, or bruteforce, or something else.
A thought: It seems that as people get richer around the world they move away from $200 Androids to what is more perceived as luxury: iPhones.
I've recently played a bit with a Chromebook I have for work, best I can describe it is as "ok". It's kind of fun to be able to write emails, or journal/blog in Google Docs. I really can't see how I would recommend it to anybody really with just that ability. Even non-tech people like to download the occasional program, and not everything is on the web. The Chromebook is able to run Android apps which makes it slightly more useable (Looks like ChromeOS Flex cannot?).
The ability to run Crostini makes it more developer friendly. I was able to set up Android Studio, Python, Gcc, and it's a fairly decent on-the-go dev machine... I don't live such a nomadic lifestyle, but I can see it being pretty fun if you do.
text="foo&sendPasswordTo=hacker" or text="foo&admin=1"
You can imagine a potentially dangerous parameter and value being passed.
It's an interesting point that malware is typically poorly developed, but not sure what the point of this research is.
Another point to consider is that most towns in Massachusetts seem to use replacement cost as the main method of appraisal versus potential income/value. Meaning, 2 families appraise for nearly the same as a single family when they are in reality worth 1.5-2x more in potential income via rent or selling.