3,592 karma · joined August 26, 2010
Lots of it was "ready for printing", but not actually printed yet.
If the default home page and /r/all can all be flooded with posts about her, it's not exactly a small group of extremists.
But at the expense of meaning that some couples wouldn't be able to marry, for, what - the next decade? Fifty years? And it's not as if a broader change to the meaning of marriage is off of the cards as a result of this - let's take the wins as they come.
I don't think anyone would disagree with that? But hiding useful tools isn't necessarily bad design either - there's usually a tradeoff to be made to help the majority of users perform a common interaction easier vs. surfacing a more infrequently used tool more prominently.
* the very first animation (a slide transition to the left) was janky
* The app was unable to get my GPS location (it's being shared properly, and I have intermittent GPS signal, but if it was using the native fused location provider this would work perfectly)
* Buttons have no touch feedback.
* It's not the platform standard navigation drawer
* It's not the platform standard action bar
* The touch drag on the navigation drawer lags behind the finger position more than it should
* Non-native map has really bad pinch-zoom-pan gestures
As an Android developer I'm sure I'm consciously noticing things that lots of other users might not, but if this is the best Cordova still has to offer... :/
The two that immediately spring to mind are Lord Robert Winston and Lord Andrew Lloyd-Webber.
I think the article discussed this mainly in the context of Kindle. It's only digital in app purchases that need to go through Apple's payment processing.
Adverts on a webpage might definitely make it less likely that a user comes away with that answer, but I don't think they'd invalidate a user's successful result any more than gossiping with the librarian would invalidate their help if they successfully find an answer.