eshch

what business and to what government? are you in your dreams?

dunno, there is the one-time toggle in the notification area for 100% in my pixel and there is a toggle to turn off these adaptive features in settings.

Some factories were in Ukraine, the factory even did some stuff for S-300 after USSR broke.

https://uk-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/%D0%96%D1%83%...

>just an identification of these as AA missiles would have been enough to kill the story

Oh, you don't know the story how Ukraine constantly blames Russia for striking civilians by repurposed S-300 missiles!

I bet this is the reason they are still in denial about the Poland incident. Because it breaks the legend and points to the real cause: issues with the missiles they launched. Meanwhile there is a constant flow of videos where Ukraine's S-300 missiles fly into land.

Ukraine should know not from AP whose missile it was, but they are still in denial, can you imagine?

You will be surprised how many times in the news about those missiles they were specifically called Russian-made/produced.

Another funny fact that most likely it's USSR-made missile. I don't think Ukraine bought any arms from Russia, so everything they have is USSR-made they were an integral part of.

Unrelated, but inspired. A lot of people can't get food and other goods and services even though it's close to them or possible to provide them right now. And it works as intended and a few think that something went wrong.

It's rather the opposite: if there were no such people, it would be the scariest thing to people. Because how can communism go? Wrong answers only.

Musk has bought Twitter out of activism and is possibly hostile to a certain number of employees.

Well, if only Tesla was an example for others in that.

why use drives and not browse files in browser or the like? what's the use case?

>depriving them of transit revenue

So should Russia be obliged to pay for transit and provide gas to Ukraine? Why wouldn't Ukraine pursue gas supplies from other sources? It had at least 8 years for that, but all the time was spent on opposing NS2.

"that was unwise" is a simplification, not a proper explanation. Russia is a cheap resource supplier, so it was beneficial for European countries to leverage it for their economy to be more competitive with US at least.

Saudi Arabia has its own bunch of issues with democracy (there is none, imagine), human rights (surprise), a war with neighbouring Yemen (sounds familiar?), but for some magical reason no one cares and alienates Saudi Arabia, and everyone is very forgetful and blind about their issues and doesn't interfere.

People's thoughts are literally tunnelled.

Well, seems you don't give yourself a chance that your idea of Putin might be a mistake. Not a very comfortable position to think rationally.

Just to clarify for those who doesn't track this game. The part "despite the sanctions" is important here. The turbine was sent not back to Russia, but to Germany. And Russia tells there is no exemption to get this turbine to Russia, it was given only for Germany. Besides this turbine they refer to a few others not being fixed or sent for repair, so this one is even not the biggest issue, but for some reason it's commented the most.

Well, I was not going to change your question. Why would I?

I'm just going to draw attention to the situation both sides "could put an end to this today, but they won't, because the loss of face is worse than the loss of life."

It depends on the purposes of the actor and the purpose of the strategy.

The last sentence is applicable to both sides by the way.

Especially because of https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/08/ukraine-ukrai...

But both sides are hostages of their own politics and narratives of who's good and who's bad.

Well, it's democracy at stake. Doesn't it justify everything? Because if not, this example is not the biggest issue.

Anyway, a bit of hypocrisy doesn't hurt.

Why did they not do that before and chose Russian gas instead of nuclear power? It's puzzling me what bad did they find in nuclear power.

bc I say so is a poor argument and you know it

This doesn't make it less speculative. What would is to incorporate less assumptions or to prove some its assumptions with practice.

I like speculativity very much, it's just a note on it.

I'm not sure Orthodox Christians celebrate Christmas with a tree. At least in Russia the tree is mounted for New Year celebration and it lasts till Orthodox Christmas for granted. Actually it usually lasts to the so-called Old New Year - New Year in Old Style (meaning Julian Calendar before introduction of Gregorian one by Bolsheviks).

because you can proof they didn't i guess

how does it feel to be so sure replicating western propaganda?

there's no such thing as entirely someone's fault. you live in black and white.

i don't know, was the whole germany literal nazi? well, half europe was. was hitler the enemy of the whole world? well, not until he did his job keeping commies under control. noone cared about jews and racism, ok? einstein moved to us from nazi germany and was shocked by racism towards black. he was lucky he's not black.

it's not a tale of good and bad. and it doesn't need to. hating your enemy is hating yourself for the enemy being in your mind, being close to you, being in your news or the same continent. love your enemy to love yourself.

if you don't mind, why should ceo be sanctioned for this? is there a chance for him to do the opposite? it's basically punishment for being a ceo of a russian company. google does pretty much the same as yandex and baidu. and it was going to do the same trying to go to china. what eu does can't stop yandex from doing that, so it boils down to just alienating. not for eu's good. the war will end and eu will depend on US even more.

once noone replies, i'll share my understanding, but i didn't have any experience with that i think because they can (demand money from anyone due to intellectual property).

i'm not sure if anyone have challenged it. or i may be wrong and basically they can enforce their demands based on usage of their brand only. or noone really has needed that, because everyone is happy to collaborate with the arm company in some other areas besides licensing, so this very fee is nothing for them.

what's the team or product?

c'mon, i don't think he's going to have any problems with that. there is a lot of russian citizens in europe and we would know if they had any troubles with that. i think there may be some issues with some angry people, but it's not systemic.

do you want to know all my wrong tries to make a thing work? why are you sure that all the commits i did are not nonsense? i look at the history as a way to 1) divide my work into reusable pieces of changes 2) document my changes to read for other developers.

apart from questionable choices of data to analyze (open-source has its own specific), the study proves only that heroes are good in hero projects. perfect.

it's very easy to realize how it can damage or ruin a project. it reveals once you need to implement a big feature to address some new business needs that can be critical for the company to survive. you have large code base and you should not break something. the clock is ticking, the rivals don't sleep, the market doesn't wait.

or you can just waste all the time firefighting with consequences of bad software.

it's not the only factor, but it can matter. the majority of companies i worked suffer from this. what really mitigates the problem is that competitors have the same problem on average.