420 karma · joined February 11, 2013
Blatant plug: https://github.com/erdewit/HiFiScan
It also shows the maximum power (in mW or dB) for the channels, which is also key to get a good reception. The dB notation is for example (20), which corresponds to 100 mW. Every 3 dB is a factor 2 in power, so (23) is 200 mW.
For older encodings such as MPEG2, as used in DVDs, it does work. For newer codecs with higher compression I can't extract a heartbeat signal anymore when using the tool that I've written for that (*).
Author here. The term "phase-neutral" simply means here that the impulse response is symmetrical and doesn't add a phase shift. It doesn't even try to neutralize the phase characteristics of the room, which is what you may be thinking. In fact the phase information from the measurement is completely discarded. Furthermore, the frequency response is averaged to get a more general and robust (less over-fitted) correction that works pretty well across the room. Try it...
Something similar goes for Linux.
The resampling shouldn't matter much in theory, but in practice it's pretty noticeable. It seems to be optimized for CPU usage instead of audio quality.
It has been talked about for a long time, probably 4 years now.
lst = [0]
%timeit lst[0] = 1
33.9 ns ± 0.0415 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000000 loops each)
arr = np.empty(1, dtype=int)
%timeit arr[0] = 1
73.4 ns ± 0.306 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000000 loops each)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC5313540/
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=white+led+spectrum&atb=v310-1&iax=...
This preprocessor on the other hand throws away some of least significant bits to save data. This increases the quantization noise but has no other sort of artifacts. The quantization noise can be dithered to fall in the higher frequencies (noise shaping) and is generally not perceptible.
The signal-to-noise ratio is lower than CD quality but still good enough so that noise is not audible:
http://soundexpert.org/articles/-/blogs/audio-quality-of-blu...
My understanding is that it does not really fight the virus (viral load stays the same), but that it does prime the immune system so as not react too violently. In other words it prevents a cytokine storm:
A distinction can be made between science on the one hand and scientists on the other.
There's also the class of "Loitering munition", which was used to great effect in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war.
https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/loitering-munitions-pre...