270 karma · joined August 21, 2021
Sure. But the numbers are certainly trending in a direction that US doesn't seem to want to go in. So, it is what it is, I suppose. Draw your own conclusions.
> On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
And effects of this, resist and unsubscribe, wouldn't be a factor so quickly. AFAIK this only launched less than a week or two ago.
I don't know my guy, your system isn't exactly top notch for most people - I don't think you need to look very hard to see that if you try.
Random examples:
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/OECD_hea... - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Life_exp...
There's something very very wrong here when your paying that much per capita and a lot of people are still struggling.
The difference here is are you downloading a random dll from a well known source or from http://free-vpn-fast-internet.dwnloadfree.ru/free-chrome-vpn...? My mom isn't going to know the difference and will click the big green DOWNLOAD NOW button blindly.
no-config
target-trc=pq
target-prim=bt.2020
vo=gpu-next
Wont be 100% accurate, but hopefully somewhat watchableI can only think of cosmetics (makeup), skin care (acne, moisturizer), botox, and steroids/PEDs/HGH/etc that could improve physical disadvantages that cant be improved otherwise. But not an area I'm too experienced in. What type of chemicals are you talking about?
US figures are here, https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/employment-l..., click "Information" in the graph options and you'll notice it hasn't rebounded much since the 2022/23 downturn.
If you have people you can get your direct referrals for positions, you'll better your odds of getting something right now vs cold applications.
Who killed shareholder value? Why would employees do this?
This to shall pass.
I found it funny because these are the same VC who spent a decade throwing money at anything with first Cloud, then ML/Deep Learning, then Blockchain, then threw money like no tomorrow during Covid, and now are like, yeah, we want you to not do any of that stuff anymore, just like actually make money now.
The '/s' is an indicator of sarcasm in text, you'll see it in online comments from time to time. Hard to convey sarcasm online otherwise.
And yes, as the other guy said, oh you're an AI company!? Here's a few million. We'll see how long that hype lasts for these "AI" startups.
VC money hose is drying up I suppose
$12/mo invested to return ~6% over 30 years:
End balance: $11,751.08
Total Interest: $7,431.08
Total not spent on Spotify: $4,320.00
Over a 50 year time horizon, the numbers become more fun: End balance: $43,155.05
Total Interest: $35,955.05
Total not spent on Spotify: $7,200.00
Of course, bunch of assumption, 6% return, past performance doesn't indicate future return etc etc, and I doubt Spotify is going to exist in 30 in its current form, small probably it does, but odds are against that if I had to bet.Maybe those boomers are onto something about avocado toast /s
And you're clearly conflating a user's karma with how many comments they have.
Cite your source (did you see it first hand? If so say that) or you're just spewing BS even if there's some truth to it.
Any link you can share?
Edit: Google "disinflation wealth redistribution" provides some relevant results