> Could I get centimetre-level cat tracking?
Iirc from last time I used dwm3000 modules (circa 2020) the best resolution they could achieve was 10cm.
I'm unsure if adding more anchors for an overdetermined solution can improve on this limitation.
1,883 karma · joined September 8, 2017
Iirc from last time I used dwm3000 modules (circa 2020) the best resolution they could achieve was 10cm.
I'm unsure if adding more anchors for an overdetermined solution can improve on this limitation.
Lead is notoriously heavy, but if you buy a 737 and it only ever has to fly you and a couple other people, it might be feasible.
Or I guess they could just line one section where they spend the majority of the time.
> negating the entire point of using AI to begin with
I can almost certainly wash dishes faster than my dishwasher, but the dishwasher frees me up to do other things. Not to mention, you can run many agents in parallel. Resulting in your overall code production throughput (the issue you're raising) being greater.
Mathematicians / folks knowledgeable on the subject - do you think Fermat had an error in his (lost) proof? Or that there exists a solution that perhaps is more straightforward than Wiles's?
My understanding is that Wiles had to use a ton of math (and invent some new math?) that had not yet been invented in Fermat's time.
This could be similar to the fisher space pen. There's a common urban legend that NASA spent millions developing the space pen, while the soviets simply used pencils. Fisher actually paid for the development of the space pen.
Adding the unpaywalled option
When I was in grad school I tried getting my hands on a phi, it seemed impossible.