54 karma · joined April 7, 2011
Home ownership does have very advantageous tax consequences in the US compared to other instruments - e.g.: deductible interest, tax breaks on capital gains.
But it also depends on your stage of life. If there is a good chance you'll just randomly move to a different city or country in the next few years, then i would not recommend buying a home.
But you can't have your cake and eat it too. Without sales/marketing, you can't expect any growth. And expectation of future exponential growth is the trigger for these very high tech company valuations. Without that growth, I would value it like a blue chip company.
The average P/E ratio of the S&P 500 is about 20 times earnings. That would put the valuation of the company at about $50 million - a far cry from what they want to value it at.
Or, if you do it by sales, the average P/S ratio of the S&P 500 is about 1.7 times sales. Which puts their valuation at about $210 million - still a far cry from what they want to value it at.
So, while they have a scalable and profitable business today, they don't have one which comes anywhere close to justifying their valuation outside the silicon valley bubble. Ergo, they better still be in the search stage.
I would guess the number of wall street traders with a net worth > $30 million would be higher.
Does anyone know of any real statistics on that?
Other languages which strongly value backwards compatibility and were created around the same time have the same issue - e.g.: C#/.NET, i believe python as well
Does anyone know what memory corruption bugs they are referring to?
http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/rendering.html is a great page describing CSS performance.
Selectors like '.nav a' would not be allowed at all as a part of my team's CSS best practices, as it is a descendant selector that uses a tag as the key. (On the other hand, most sites, expecially non-dynamic sites, don't need to optimize CSS at all, as there are usually other things which are the bottleneck)
In 2010, you may not yet know that the timezones will change in 2012, but you might still need to store a 2012 date in your database.
So, the best you can do, if storing in UTC, is store that 2012 date using 2010 timezone rules, as you don't yet know what the 2012 time zone rules are going to be