89 karma · joined January 19, 2012
I didn't get this from the article.
I understood the issue to be:
1. It is undisputed that the lottery is required to display odds (return $$s per $$s spent). 2. It is undisputed that the lottery displays the theoretical maximum return given optimal play 3. The lottery supports a feature that does not play optimally 4. The issue: Should the lottery be required to display the rate of return given the use of auto-play?
That meant that EU based firms could only buy our Install-behind-your-firewall version.
Is it the same for the financial district, perhaps?
My experience is anecdotal, but it might be worthwhile to ask your acquaintances why they buy so many ebooks after buying a Kindle.
I don't find the Clojure that I write to be implicit.
Normally, though, algorithms are not copyrightable. Though Books about algorithms are.
In this case, the guy published a book containing a maze, so reproduction of the maze should fall under copyright.
This would be like someone commenting on a Java article by saying, "I'm not a programmer, let alone a Java programmer."
I didn't read any insult in his comment.
The system that I'm familiar with only tracks where you're going. It didn't (as of a couple months ago) have any way of linking your mac back to a consumer profile.
Mine had 1 classroom devoted to computer classes. These computers were Windows NT workstations. Students logged in with normal accounts (not administrators) but there were no other restrictions.
That isn't to say that they didn't lock down any computers. They did. The library computers were essentially chrome books. All you could do was run IE and Word.
batch scripts in windows behave like scripts on unix do when you source them. That means that you can write a batch script called "foo.bat" with the contents of "cd \whatever\directory\you\please" and it will change your current directory when run.
From there, it would not be difficult to write a batch script that in turn wrote batch scripts like "foo.bat" above.
With bash, you would have to create functions or aliases to get the same effect.
Before the interview, I will check out your stuff and make sure I have compilers/interpreters for your favorite languages (as best I can identify them). Then I will do a combination of live coding, and talking about repositories that might have caught my eye.
In this kind of situation "Why did I do it that way? Because I wanted to see what would happen" Is a great answer. It leads into a discussion about what happened, and whether or not you would do it again (without waiting half an hour for you to work through a problem of my devising). I could not care less whether the code was good or bad if you can show that you analyzed the experience and learned from it.
Part of writing good code is having written bad code in the past. I get that. I'm a programmer myself.
Now, we do not use Github as a filter (as the article discourages). If you put your Github in your resume, I will use it to make the interview itself a more valuable experience for both of us. If you chose not to put your Github on your resume, then you will get the generic interview, and I might not have your text editor/IDE ready to go.
If you want to try it, just brew install emacs --cocoa and clone the repo to ~/.emacs.d
A coworker and I trade snippets of elisp for our configurations over email, and whenever I update the repo on one machine, the other needs to pull it down and evaluate the file (eval-buffer)
I have not found sharing customizations of emacs to be very difficult, but I also don't use any god packages like emacs starter-kit, or prelude (which I haven't heard of). I have let my configuration grow organically.
They allow mutation as long as it's localized.
BrainTree and you may not make the same decision, and you both could be right.
If I had two disk drives, I'm not sure which it would eject. I suspect that this is what WayneDB was referring to.
In other words, he got restitution because of articles like this one. He no longer buys kindle books.
Your testimony tells me that Win8 may see better adoption amongst windows programmers than windows users.
Social engineering only gets you both if you can autorun the executable upon insertion of the usb stick.
Also keep in mind that if you're grading 50 people like I was, you won't remember what variables the students used between assignments. The stuff they would do to throw me off the trail wouldn't help much at all.
If I found a student had copied from a neighbor or whatever, I'd ask them both what had happened. It was uncommon that they would deny it. I'd tell the professor and mark the assignment a zero. After that, it was between the students and the professor.
Try it yourself, write a small program, perhaps a script to read a CSV of numbers and do a pivot table or something, then copy it and use whatever technique you like to hide the copying. Now read them back to back. Give no more than 1 minute to each (since they both compile and pass tests). You'll spot the copying immediately.
Disclaimer: I did TA work for undergraduate stuff; typically for students in liberal arts and sciences just trying to get through their comp-sci requirements.
There may be a cultural factor to it as well. I don't find the need to drive everywhere like I did growing in the 90s, but I certainly don't have a ton of income left over for car and fuel (let alone even more debt for a mortgage and the other costs that entails).
My behavior is driven more by economics than culture.