ek_erilaz

Thanks for this! I was looking at your transparency report (https://quad9.net/about/transparency-report/) and I notice 2026 is not included in the 'list of years in which we have not received a request for data', despite the list being updated quarterly according to the text below it. When I saw the page earlier, I assumed that either the list isn't actually updated quarterly, or I'd discovered an exciting example of a warrant canary.

I'd never considered such a tool before today, but the example sparked the exact same idea for me, as if it were the most obvious next step to invert the causal direction and externalize the inner reading voice (instead of trying to force the internal reading to follow the external audio). I'm not sure that it would improve reading comprehension or make the experience better in some ineffable way, but it would be really interesting to try it out. Questions arise:

- Would it help with reading comprehension? Speed? Enjoyment?

- If the audio was your own synthesized voice, would that help comprehension and immersion?

- If the audio was in a voice very different from your own, and you used this system for several hours a day, would it change your natural inner reading voice, or even some other aspect of your self-perception? I don't believe I've experienced Such a tight coupling between thoughts driving external responses before; I didn't expect to do so until real-time brain scanning got a lot better than current SotA.

- While reading, I frequently speed along and then jump back a word, sentence, or paragraph to slowly review it. In this system, the audio would slow down as I read back through more slowly, almost sounding out words along with me. I just read a book filled with the names of obscure french villages, and I couldn't just ignore them - instead bogged down in sounding them out and trying to guess how to pronounce them. Having a system sounding them out with/for me would have been awesome. This assumes the system is good at pronouncing things in various languages (mostly solved problem), and picking sane defaults when pronunciation conflicts arise (mostly unsolved?). In those cases, how hard would inferring be? Google translate is pretty good at generating localized pronunciations, but TTS systems struggle.

- Specifically for non-technical reading, it would be interesting to try having a very low level of ambient noise backgrounding the speech, driven by an LLM analyzing the text for obvious cues. Tavern sounds, rushing of wind in the mountains, crackling campfire, or even music generation (creepy dungeon etc etc)... When you pause reading for a moment to look away from the book, the speech obviously stops - but the tavern sounds continue. Might help people 'lock in' who normally get distracted from whatever they're reading.

Same, for the "education"! In my hometown, lakes and rivers remained frozen for half the year. There were two such lakes separated by narrow dirt trails through the trees. Each winter, some kind soul went out there with their plow and created a drifting course that snaked around one lake, through the woods, wound around the other lake, and back. We'd take whatever vehicles we had access to and race there at night. I'll never forget careening around that track with the windows down, snow blowing in, music blaring, swerving around my friend's mom's minivan and trying to fend off another buddy in his rusty Toyota pickup.

I like to think we became safer winter drivers as a result.

Your intuition was spot on! I used to cut concrete for a living, and we had several hydraulic chainsaws. The torque on those things was incredible. They were quieter than gas chainsaws, even factoring in the diesel-powered hydraulic pump in the trailer nearby. The main drawback, as other commenters mentioned, was portability. The saw itself was shockingly light (which made the torque that much more surprising) and portable - until you ran out of hydraulic line! Plus you always had to watch your lines to make sure they weren't going to get cut by a blade, pinched under a falling piece of concrete, or crushed under some piece of mechanized equipment. Interestingly, there were three lines - hydraulic in, hydraulic out, and a water hose to spray on the cutting surface and keep the dust down. It's been a decade since I worked that job, but I still clearly remember the feeling of revving one of those things up, watching the water fly everywhere, and grinning as I just carved straight into a solid concrete wall - rebar and everything. It was a delight.