558 karma · joined July 23, 2013
Makes me laugh at people who think that non STEM subjects have no value. Perhaps opening a book in one of those non STEM fields once in a while would help you avoid reinventing things consigned to the dust bin of history without realizing it.
Nearly but not quite as rich as when ride-sharing companies accidentally invent the city bus.
Lol
It's me, the company that hoards your personal data and just got hacked in a huge way, please put a camera in your house that I control which I _swear_ won't be used to spy on you.
Sort of hilariously tone deaf that they launch this right after they just got hacked.
I don't agree with that. Doing some analysis on a limited and possibly skewed data set can lull you into a false sense of understanding. It makes your ideas seems objective when they can in fact be completely baseless.
In terms of public policy you have to decide what you're optimizing for and that decision can't be made with data alone because it does not help resolve questions of value and fairness.
> Translating telephones allow people to speak to each other in different languages.
This is sort of possible, but not fluently really.
> Machines designed to transcribe speech into computer text allow deaf people to understand spoken words.
This one basically exists.
> Exoskeletal, robotic leg prostheses allow the paraplegic to walk.
I think there are some prototypes of this type of stuff but nothing in widespread use.
> Telephone calls are routinely screened by intelligent answering machines that ask questions to determine the call's nature and priority.
Not really, we have IVRs but they are in no sense "smart"
> "Cybernetic chauffeurs" can drive cars for humans and can be retrofitted into existing cars. They work by communicating with other vehicles and with sensors embedded along the roads.
Not even close
Seems like Ray Kurzweil might not be the best predictor of what is actually going to happen in the future. Seems like a bit of a snake oil salesman to me.
Fortunately a lot of the tech that does work can find a second life as progressive enhancement for human drivers. Blind spot detection, auto lane following, and smart cruise control are great features that ease some of the burden in driving and I think it's good to see them being more widely distributed in newer cars.
Funny that people complained so much about GDPR being bad for business and then get upset when things like this happen. It's almost like the two are related or something...
The Lorax living on that land does make him even more sympathetic but it's not like he was un-sympathetic before that. Funny that a popular children's story has the message "Capitalism will destroy the environment" at a time when the politics of that statement and environmental policy in general are so fraught.
Not sure what this line is supposed to mean. Is he referring to them approving them without knowing what they are?
I'm glad for the FAA's rules. U.S. air travel is extremely safe despite constant efforts on the part of airlines to reduce costs for themselves without enough concern for safety. I don't think we can trust any transportation company to value the lives of its passengers at an appropriately high level so they need to be forced with regulation.
If only people remembered that the second half of the expression about "a few bad apples" is that they "spoil the bunch."
Seems likely that the shoppers are under too much pressure to rush so that they can barely earn a living and this leads to much lower quality for the customer.
> Whenever you find something in the code you do not understand - it is too complex.
+100 to this. The general measure of whether code is good should be something like the median understanding of all the people working on the project. Something that makes a lot of sense to only one developer ultimately does not serve the group. I think people forget this quite a bit.