112 karma · joined January 14, 2015
BTW - people are quick to preface with IANAL (109,000 google results), but I think it is equally important for people to start saying IANAP (I am not a psychiatrist, 633 google results). Offering armchair psychiatric advice seems like the risks are greater than armchair legal advice, because people's lives are on the line. See what /u/tamsaraas said in this thread, it is valuable. Time to normalize IANAP.
IANAP - but being exposed to all the discussion on HN about procrastination has helped me realize that I might suffer from executive dysfunction and have ADHD. But I'm seeking therapy to get a proper diagnosis and treatment for it. I appreciate people sharing their experiences, that is valuable, both for what they deal with and what works for them, but people should probably not try to fix themselves without professional help or tell other people what will fix them.
But I would be interested in me picking 2 of those 3 for me to do, and the AI can do the third for me. So if I love coding and test writing but don't like documentation, then the AI can do the third leg for me.
I think that the quality of results from the AI would be much better than what Copilot is capable of. Even if I focussed on test writing and documentation, I think that the AI should be able to write decent code based on those two inputs.
While the company was downsizing (dot-com bust) the CTO told me to batten down the hatches while Susan was being laid off. I told him that I'm fairly confident she knows more about NT than I do and that I didn't think I could do enough to secure things, so we more or less shut things down for the night.
I sort of remember the whole company being scared of her in general. I don't know why though, she was always very nice to me and seemed pleasant in general. It was an overreaction to shut down the network that night, Susan never attempted revenge. In hindsight, she was probably an adult that understood that companies fail and it wasn't personal.
I can't see this being less than a 60 hour project for me to deal with in total, so the main thing I'm upset about is what I perceive to be a short amount of time to deal with.
So far my best bet looks like signing up as a Fastmail reseller so that users can be directly billed by Fastmail. My preference would be to stay with Google because of all the issues I think I might run into by migrating off of it (mostly related to using it for authentication for other services, which is a practice I no longer do, but did for some time).
If Google would allow each user to pay separately for what they need, then that would be an easy decision for me, because I want to stay, but I don't want to pitch 146 other Wikman's to pay me to pay Google.
Shared pain as the rest, have been hosting email for people with the same last name since 1998, and migrated to G Suite for Your Domain in 2006, and they graciously increased the max users for the free account, and I have 147 users (almost all are active). From 1998-2006 I ran the email server, and it was a pain to deal with issues and complaints (mostly poor spam filtering). I can't go back to that, and I can't afford $10,584 a year to offer free email.
I've researched some other paid options, but my biggest issue is that I just can't deal with invoicing and collecting money from 140+ people. What I really need is an email host that will direct bill all the users. I don't mind paying for email as a service, I just need someone else to deal with all the money stuff from the other users.
For others assistance in research if you will be paying the bill for the full domain, here are some options I looked at: Google Workplace - $72/year/user - advantage being no impact on users Microsoft 365 - $60/year/user - less expensive, probably equal in quality to Google Fastmail - $50/year/user - cheaper still, great reputation Rackspace - $36/year/user - cheaper still, not best reputation Namecheap - $11/year/user - most likely a get what you pay for situation
Honestly I think email is worth $72/year, and I would go that route if Google would bill each user directly.
I have very little knowledge in cameras but did have to review all the production guidelines.
Netflix doesn't mention image sensor size (CCD) but ESPN requires 2/3" or more. I'm guessing every camera they list as approved would meet that spec even though they don't specify it.
At the time I was surprised to learn that ESPN wants you to deliver all content in 720p. Wikipedia says that their Digital Center is equipped for 2160p, but they still broadcast in 720p. The archivist in me would want to receive the material greater than 720p even knowing it is to be broadcast in 720p, but I can understand the additional complexity that such a small thing can add, especially when dealing with hundreds of production companies.
I speculate that Netflix wants you to turn in higher quality video because they are factoring in that over time encoding and streaming algorithms and increased bandwidth will allow them to push higher quality feeds to end users, and they want the highest possible raw capture so they can improve the stream as technology improves, whereas ABC is content with airing footage in the future that looks as it did when it aired originally.
I was incredibly impressed at the speed that Compaq escalated the issue from a first line support person to having a couple engineers drive out to the credit union to see it with their own eyes to determine a fix (I had no pull or special access, and we're only talking 150 computers). It was convenient that this happened in Houston so the engineers were in close proximity.
This article makes me skeptical that HP would handle it the same way today that Compaq did at the time based on HPE's response to STH. I hate the buying process with both Dell and HP, but they are the brands I buy from when it is a server or workstation, because I love the build quality for both brands on their enterprise servers and high end workstations. I've never owned a consumer device from either brand, but I would not have the same expectations on a consumer device from them.
Looks like RemoteHQ launched something called Remote Browser as well, which is a SaaS browser, but more for collaborative purposes with more than one person using the same browser at the same time.
if it is a liability on their books, then i would agree with OP that it is an interest free loan.
So my crazy idea is to build a reverse cofferdam around the ship with Larssen steel pilings and pump water into it until the ship floats and straighten the ship and remove the pilings.
The previous Austin airport (Mueller, closed 1999, now a planned community) also had an IATA code of AUS. They did a single day cutover from the old to new airport, so they were never both in commercial use at the same time (Bergstrom was an Air Force base for similar years as Mueller).
edit: thih9 linked to the hn post on byorgey original blog post in 2016 and the highest comment by audeyisaacs suggests the same thing you did and got a reply from byorgey who liked the idea and added it to their blog, and outlined the pro's and con's of your suggestion.
i can't remember if in 1995 we would write the code to be AT&T or if that came a bit later.
perhaps the scraper thought it was an HTML entity starting with the & followed by the T and it added the semi-colon.
or maybe it originally was posted in 1995 without the semi-colon and before it got indexed in 2002 by archive.org someone ran a regex style replacement on old static html files at netscape to "fix" html entities.
it just doesn't seem likely that a static html file from 1995 would have had AT&T; in it, it seems more likely that it was transformed either by the scraper or some internal script run after it was originally posted.
i found an old email version of the press release on Lunds University website that does not have the semi-colon. http://www2.ldc.lu.se/temadag95/javascript.txt
and what looks like an archive of the 1995 version of the java website hosted at University of Oviedo: http://www6.uniovi.es/java-http/pr951204-03.html