802 karma · joined August 10, 2009
This works well for financial forecasting too.
IMOP "better" art is art that pushes the medium and makes people who consume it think or feel differently than they did before they consumed it. The more derivative the work, the less impact it makes on both pushing the medium and on the way we think.
In order to change the way people think and feel, it requires that the consumer of the art invest some effort in understanding it. The payoff to the consumer is they gain a new insight or feel the artist's conveyed emotion.
Pop music is not considered "better" art because it is often formulaic and designed to sell albums. Being derivative it often does not break new ground artistically. It's easy to consume (listen to) because we know what to expect musically. It's sorta' like comfort food. Listening to music that is ground breaking can often be difficult the first few listens, but then you get an "ah ha! Yes!" moment, and as your ears and brain realize what's going on, it becomes enjoyable. Then, other musicians copy it, make derivative versions that push the concept a little bit further, and you have a new genre.
There ya' go. My layman's answer. ;)
Say you move to France because US taxes increase. It's great in France. Then they up taxes, so you move to Australia. Then Australia goes to war and you disapprove, so you move again. At what point do you stick it out?
I'm not saying your country or city of origin is by default the best region for you to live. But the only reason there are great places to live is because intelligent, creative, passionate people found a community they cared about and they stayed to work through the difficult problems. You could be one of these people... or you could move to a country with currently lower taxes.
It seems to me, at some point, computers will easily out drive humans.
I'm sure there's copyright issues to deal with as soon as money changes hands too. Probably something you could work around though.
Perhaps you could simply rent the machine out by the hour. Have your client sign a liability waver, and be on your way. :)
Or heck, make it work like a coin-op copying machine.
EX: When you're 10, a year is 1/10th of your life, but when you're 60 it's only 1/60th. The magnitude of an additional year of life at 60 does not feel as great as it does when you're 10.
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/09/victory-internet-censor...
Yes, it's exhausting to socialize, but you'll grow your social skills, and you can use those skills when you really need them in the future.
Some skills come naturally to people, other people have to practice to get good at them. Social skills are no exception.
$5/month. You can afford it! ;)
Ultimately I think the answer is, you don't have to have a co-founder. If you've got the gumption to go it solo, do it.
Startups are similar to musicians, there are solo acts as well as bands.
If you haven't built something yet, do that. If you're new to the field, having something to show off and talk about in an interview is a big win.
Coworking's weakness is the landlord business model is extremely low margin. In the suggested model in the article, $400 per member X 20 members = $8,000 per month. Now consider the rent of a warehouse downtown, utilities, paying someone to run the place, and buildout. It's a quick way to go out of business.
Now, if the coworking space is run as a loss leader for another business, that's another story.
At Conjunctured our other business is happy hours at Rio Rita's. We haven't found out how to make that profitable yet, but we're gonna' keep trying by god! :p
-Conjunctured Co-Founder
Full Disclosure: That's my app.