Digitizing the Personal Library
chronicle.com
chronicle.com
As for the Fujitsu ScanSnap, I saw it recommended by the folks at 37 Signals (DHH?) and looked it up and saw that it has 20ppm colour scanning and good document feeding.
Doing what is recommended in this article is very time consuming to begin with, but made even more difficult since you're depending on Adobe. Like the author, I cringe at the thought of destroying perfectly good out-of-print hardbacks.
I'd really love to start a business around electronic books and archiving.
I've noticed that too, because when you start to stack two ranks of books on every shelf, there simply isn't any way to sort them in any reasonable manner, so it became an unsearchable nightmare many years ago. Now it's getting worse, because books (and CDs, and DVDs) pile up in boxes in front of the shelves, because all available walls are already covered. Every time I look for a particular book (or CD, or DVD) I know I may very well spend a full hour doing so. Pain.
This was definitely on my mind when I posted about the Kindle: http://jseliger.com/2010/09/29/the-last-word-on-this-version... . I only have about ~1,000 books, but it's easy for me to see that at some point I'll have more books than space, and I don't want to get more space than books. Still, I probably have at least 100 that I could discard with little loss, and I've become much choosier about buying and keeping nonfiction because so much of it is only worth reading once. And I've become choosier about not keeping fiction I don't love.
Still, I'd use something like this: http://www.diybookscanner.org/ over the Snapscan.
... the DIY book scanner is indeed tempting. But the payoff is so lousy. From what I can see, you'll tinker and tinker with the DIY scanner just to get it to keep the pages in focus and well illuminated, and to get the software workflow pieced together. Then, because you probably don't have a big budget or a machine shop, you won't get a robot that turns the pages, even an imperfect one that skips pages and occasionally mangles a book. ;) You'll have to turn the pages yourself, by hand. That labor all by itself is more expensive then 90% of my books.
Meanwhile, the Scansnap is the real thing. My favorite piece of tech gear in years. It just works. The images come out nice. My magazine pages fit perfectly on the iPad screen.
Google has done all the hard work, of course, robotics, professional book-handlers, and all. Pity that I can't access most of the fruits of that.
So at some point you just have to try and convince yourself that it is no longer 1500 and printed books are a cheap commodity. As the article points out: Publishers routinely destroy printed books. They're just ink and paper. Even most of the books you think of as priceless collectibles are not particularly priceless. The really expensive part of an out-of-print book is the ability to read the words. If you want to decorate a room in beautifully bound old books, any old book will do.
And, thanks to the economics of publishing, most of my really hard-to-find out-of-print books are old trade paperbacks printed on cheap paper. It will be a challenge to preserve these books through my lifetime anyway. Rather than wait until the things age and fall apart, I might as well take them apart myself.
And this is how I argue to myself. But still, it's hard to bring myself to use that saw. What we need is a market in sawn-up books. Just rent a copy of your rare book that's already unbound and ready for scanning. Sell it on to someone else when you're done with it. Then you can keep the original rare book (in storage, somewhere upstate) but read the text whenever you want. The fact that this (AFAIK; IANAL) is legal but simply Bittorrenting a book you don't own is not is a very clear example of the brokenness of our legal system.
I'm sure there's copyright issues to deal with as soon as money changes hands too. Probably something you could work around though.
Perhaps you could simply rent the machine out by the hour. Have your client sign a liability waver, and be on your way. :)
Or heck, make it work like a coin-op copying machine.
There are better solutions for high speed book scanning that don't destroy the book in the process. http://www.instructables.com/id/DIY-High-Speed-Book-Scanner-...
A major portion of the book is dedicated to the destruction of the library's printed materials for digitization purposes.
But I'm also running out of space and I find that technical books become obsolete in a matter of months. So I stopped buying books that talk about frameworks and such and now only stick to the classics that won't lose value unless the technology substantially changes. Others, I now purchase in a digital format.(I have a Sony ebook reader)
Digitization is one approach, but I am too attached to the books to destroy them. And I agree with the sentiment of the article, it's just not the same.
The problem is that I won't ever buy DRM-laden shit. Evar, for chrissake, may they die and burn in the pits of hell. That unfortunately forces me to buy books and CDs, though I'm now an heavy user of my ebook reader and gutenberg.org.
It's the tactile feeling that differentiate books from OCR scanned pages in a PDF. And wise publishers would use this differentiation to sell books when e-books is more popular.