755 karma · joined August 6, 2013
It's not that much larger -- I guess reinfections are hard to find -- but surprisingly this found that ICU admission was higher for reinfections.
Small sample size, but even similar result is somewhat surprising -- I would've thought the 2nd infection would be weaker.
I had the impression Chicago was actually losing people, but that info was old, from the previous decade where it lost 7%.
> Since we can’t change Yale, we have to tear it down.
Maybe the author thinks a similar "revolution" would ripple to other Ivys?
> Since we can’t change Yale, we have to tear it down.
Is abolishment really easier than reform?
For reference, those numbers are all higher than the typical mortgage default rate: https://www.statista.com/statistics/205959/us-mortage-delinq...
I wonder if it also signals that CNN is trying to appeal more to conservatives?
Yeah, “specific” would have been better.
Also, $50k is a weird number to choose in your example. Presumably the best players would command much more than that.
I'll just add one memorable example of where ads actually worked for me. I was frustrated by how thick wallets were and so I happened to Google "thin wallets," and got an ad for the "Allet", which was exactly what I was looking for, and I did end up buying it, and I still use Allets to this day. That said, I tried the same search just now and Allet didn't come up in the first page of results, so I'm not sure what to make of that, ha.
Related to this whole discussion, if you turn off ad targeting, you often get some garbage ads.
Can't broad and shallow be manipulative--"keeping up with Joneses"--while deep and narrow is purely informational?
But even here, there’s still the possibility for a better world with targeting, given good intentions of the targeting system (I know I know). Surely the best world isn’t one where casino ads are sent out blindly?
It seems the problem this site is really taking issue with is privacy.