Pooping hippos create ‘community guts’ in African ponds
science.org
science.org
You might think an article in Science could manage to avoid a deeply misleading falsehood before completing its very first sentence.
Despite some statistical correlations and mouse studies, the idea that gut bacteria influence autism in humans is poorly supported. And recent studies suggest the influence may go in the other direction. [1]
Just keep in mind that "top" journals like Science, Nature, and PNAS have a tendency to publish flimsy ideas if the result is sensational. They are the tabloids of science and must be taken with a hefty pinch of salt.
[1] https://cosmosmagazine.com/health/body-and-mind/autism-gut-m...
It's like the nytimes. Popular to crap on it, but in the end they still put out good journalism.
> Examples include real or dramatized medical footage, or depictions of disgusting or scary content in a horror or fantasy context.
That was from the "mild" section, too. Looking at the more extreme bullet point for the same rating, there's
> It may also include pervasive imagery or situations that are disturbing or repulsive to the average viewer.
Which, given that the entire video is about literal buttholes and feces, probably fits to some degree.
Otherwise the video just gets flagged and there's no recourse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganges
https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/fatal-bacteria-like-e-...
One was to fill a water bottle with "Ganga Water" to splash onto some hanging fabric at the entrance of the temple.
On the 14km hike up the mountain to the temple I was invited to a chillum circle. As we sat around smoking and talking I saw one of the other people reach down and take a drink from the water bottles so many people had hanging from their belts.
I asked, "Is that... your Ganga water?"
They responded, "Yes! Would you like some?"
I said, "Thank you, but my body is unfamiliar with drinking Ganga Water. I think it will make me sick."
They replied, "Maybe you are already sick if you are unable to drink Ganga Water."
Presumably it also aids in the spread of hippo-hosted parasites?
And yet apparently that cost doesn't outweigh the benefits of this behavior.
The sneeze reflex is complex, and clearly not encoded in the very small and simple viruses that trigger it.
I have a hypothesis that many undiscovered pathogens in fact have a positive impact on survival rates of their host, which is why behaviours that deliberately spread (some) pathogens are so common.
This happened in South America with a cholera outbreak. In countries with good sanitation, strains that made their hosts sicker ended up dying out because people had to stay indoors more. So the strains that were less sever allowed people to go out and interact socially and therefore spread the cholera further.
Arguably the same thing might be happening with the Omicron variant which early data suggests is much much milder than previous variants
The evolutionary selection pressure that can result in weaker viral variants comes down to the fact that deadlier viral genetics die off in the corpses they create from their hosts, sometimes leaving only the weaker genetics in the hosts that didn't die. That selection pressure really isn't there for any of the COVID variants, especially with its long incubation time. The virus is free to mutate into stronger variants in the mean time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zpDF3Py7r8
>Mud, mud, glorious mud, nothing quite like it for cooling the blood.
Keep in mind that lack of clean water is a _huge_ killer. The benefits would have to be ridiculous for it to be worth it.
Net-net clean water is definitely more important but there's still some drawbacks.
In my native country there's a joke/saying that says that kids who ate their own shit as babies have good luck. So if someone tells you you have good luck, their making a joke about you being a shiteater lol.
I've always wondered if this might be rooted in the large number of observed health benefits associated with early childhood exposure to diverse microbiomes