1,825 karma · joined April 5, 2009
YC Badge: 0x97c9f955d50c03752e78ed551256c48f779fbe82
In the case of companies, a benevolent dictatorship is fine because employees, customers and investors can all exit and find other companies. It's at the nation state level where you need more structural veto points. (Arguably true for towns/counties/states too, but you still have the right to exit so...)
Previously I was the spam cop for a big sender and saw up close all the ways our clients would try to weasel around it.
I'm building an identity verification platform for age verification. I set it up as a nonprofit because I think this is a public good that should be provided by governments. It's mostly a proof of concept right now. My long term goal is to get state DMVs using it (or something like it).
And of course governments attract hackers because they tend to not be up to date on security best practices.
A single abstraction layer on blockchains allows more developers and security experts to contribute and innovate.
I've always had questions about this. Did he not look at the senior leadership and get a sense if that's true?
Lofty.ai used crypto as the back end for their fractionalized property platform, but there is no mention of crypto. I used it to sell a portion of my rental property. Here's a video I made about the process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgPLXFwhZbY&t=2s
So on one hand she gets to be more picky; on the other, there is a larger share of men likely to have status anxiety.
Not the WorldCoin version, but one that states and other state-backed providers can use to verify that someone is who they say they are.
In that environment ZIRP was the only solution. Ben Bernanke (a Bush appointee, re-appointed by Obama) devoted his academic career to how the Fed could have prevented the Great Recession. He was right.