682 karma · joined September 21, 2009
2. Here's a volunteer hotline to call for help: http://rails.pockethotline.com/
Also, because I was annoyed at all the unfunny, low-effort jokes posted in the comments on the linked G+ page, which felt like piling-on, I confess that I'm pleased at the turnabout. Good twist.
And the @str title=null line above the class seems very odd.
This is great because you can indent code under it that's relevant to it, that would normally end up cluttering your function's narrative up with housekeeping for variables.
This is a much more pleasant way to deal with PHP. Check out the documentation, it is outstanding. http://code.google.com/p/php-snow/wiki/Class
More Guns Less Crime is a snappy title, but mostly seems like a work of ideological pro-firearm propaganda in light of its author's many documented ethical issues.
http://memagazine.asme.org/Articles/2010/December/Unwritten_...
This is ridiculously awesome. I think your reply did not contribute much of use to the conversation, and I think that's why you got downvoted (wasn't me, I can't downvote).
I didn’t know there were that many airports in the world!
I think the price is very fair.
China selling all its dollars at once would depress the dollar significantly. That’s why China won’t do any such thing. It would be pointlessly wasteful to set their own money on fire. Storing $3 trillion IOUs in a vault is already a terrible way to use money. It would be better for that money to be in the Chinese economy.
If China starts spending more of its trade surplus on helping people at home instead of stockpiling useless green pieces of paper, all the better. This will have an expansionary effect on the United States, since that’s where the dollars will eventually be spent, and they’re not doing anyone any good being frozen in China’s vault.
If that’s the case, programming must be a hellish experience for you, since it mostly consists of labeling things well.
Racism is a dangerous toy to play with. Just because you’re a good person who didn’t become a racist after reading that doesn’t mean it’s a mistake to cry foul against racist caricature. The caricature is still wrong. It communicated nothing but the writer’s lazy prejudice.
The (general, de-stupidified) point being made by the caricaturist can be correct, and the racist caricature foul and despicable...all at the same time!
There are lots of reasons why someone might call himself or herself a hyphenated American. I called myself an Arab-American to establish bona fides for my confident statement that Achmed is not a name, nothing more. You don’t actually know anything about me because I said I’m an Arab-American. That might mean I’m culturally American, culturally Arab, some mix of varying degrees of the two, or even fully both. I may simultaneously consider myself fully Arab and better at being American than most 10th-generation Americans. Who are you to say different?
What is the point, anyway? So what if my opinion of this speech is determined by where I grew up? The tasteless racist caricature I’m criticizing is what it is and would be that whether I even existed or not.