12 karma · joined December 8, 2016
Both the ERP, and the explanation of the CHSH with the difference being cos^2(theta) an isn’t that just Malus’s law? So in the case of the ERP experiment, if you fired single polarized particles at a polarizing filter at one angle or the other you still get cos^s(theta) as the difference without requiring entanglement, no?
That implies, in the case of entangled particles there is more than one dimension of “whatever” that causes the polarizing filter to “choose” whether to extinguish the particle on non-equal angles - like azimuth/elevation instead of just theta? It just seems to me that rather than disproving a “hidden variable”, it requires one?
Like I said, I assume I’m missing something and am wrong.
Orthic has some of that, but not to the extent of Gregg.
Open office environments are terrible for productivity, stress, health, etc. — the science is pretty well settled here.
Cars comparatively are nothing.
Postel’s Law: > Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others (often reworded as "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept").
Also known as the robustness principle https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle
There's also handywrite (http://www.alysion.org/handy/handywrite.htm) which has the nice thing that the essence of it (not much different than gregg really) fits on an index card.