imo there's a piece of the service explanation missing on your website, which probably lies somewhere between the intro video and the list of components on offer.
988 karma · joined May 12, 2020
imo there's a piece of the service explanation missing on your website, which probably lies somewhere between the intro video and the list of components on offer.
The issue with that is it’s the same shift a lot of outlets made to try and keep pace too, which has resulted in a bunch of legacy outlets with little distinct editorial voice left. That’s not a barrier to keeping clicks, but it does feel like a failing strategy to retain cultural cache.
Though I digress, by all accounts Pitchfork had actually gone from losing money pre Puja to actually making money, so this was probably not about the outlet failing in some way. I personally agree with those noting how soon this has come after the staff unionisation vote
Pretty harsh descriptor, but I’m from the North and often have referred to my area as a shithole. It’s not the area’s fault, it’s 40 years of mismanagement and underfunding, but still not a good place.
Story is still a bit of a mess, pacing wise, but its voice acting has aged well (unlike X).
It’s a different game to the classic run, but I would rank it up amongst my favourites in the series now.
I realise this is completely permited by Slack/other services and you agree to it as part of ToS, but people did with Facebook too. Doesn't lessen the rude awakening that awaits the majority of users.
Looking through the Wikimedia blog post you linked, it looks like the final DSA takes most of their problems in to account?
It was certainly a possibility, but staggers my mind that companies of this size all decided it was a sureity.
If I were to be uncharitable, this is the effect of senior staff at these companies having been completely detached from the pandemic experience of the majority of the population. Lots of people still had to go to work F2F, lots of people spent it cooped up in 30m2 apartments with flatmates they hate.
Is there a name for this approach/any info on why it doesn't work?
const flow = (...fns) => x0 => fns.reduce(
(x, f) => f(x),
x0
);
function slamTimTamsUsingFlow(timtams) {
return timtams
.slice(0, MAX_TIMTAMS)
.map(flow(
biteArbitraryCorner,
biteOppositeCorner,
insertInBeverage,
drawLiquid,
insertIntoMouth));
}
Just be written as: const slamTimTams = timtams =>
timtams
.slice(0, MAX_TIMTAMS)
.map(timtam => timtam.biteArbitraryCorner()
.biteOppositeCorner()
.insertInBeverage()
.drawLiquid()
.insertIntoMouth());
Feels much more concise and readable than the flow exampleRegardless, it’s not as “stupid” as you claim. How many social networks have added a premium tier for non commercial users, while degrading the quality of the free tier and been successful?
Closest I can think of are dating apps, which have a unique driver behind them that Twitter doesn’t have.