dorian-graph

It was previously JS/TS, but they rewrote it in Rust, sometime in the past 12 months.

You jest, but I was listening to a podcast episode today by the Changelog, and this guy was effusive how AI will replace SaaS, etc. and when asked about reviewing, said no one can do it well, so they don't/won't do it for key internal software they vibecoded.

> you assume “the left” (globally!?) is in support of the Ayatollah?

Where did I imply that, justonceokay? And no, I don't think every leftist supports the Ayatollah. Do you think every leftist, globally, doesn't support them?

I was as vague as you were, in referring to leftists. I gave a concrete example of there being confusion about who the bad guys, since you questioned why leftists (or anyone) would be confused.

> Why would leftists (or anyone) be confused who the bad guy is here?

Because there are literally pro-Palestine protests that have supporters of Iran's supreme leader[1].

I've seen a lot of comments and sentiment from leftists in support of Iran.

What bug(s) do you have, that you didn't know this?

[1]: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-04/international-reactio...

> .. that's when everybody struggles.

That's not true though, is it?

Appreciated, thank you!

How's the UX for jails these days? I remember trying to use it barebones and also some of the wrappers.

Why not talk about other parts of coexisting with humans? Parasitical relationships, having to learn and adapt, communicating your needs instead of making assumptions, etc.?

I've used it a few times now. It's a really smooth experience for quite a new package.

There's also https://github.com/bartolli/codanna, that's similarly new. I'll have to try that again, and this one.

> This seems very noisy/unhelpful.

The irony of this, when talking about AI.

There's also https://github.com/MiniApollo/kickstart.emacs.

It's not possible so far via Bumblebee, unfortunately[1].

[1] https://github.com/elixir-nx/bumblebee/issues/209

Context: https://www.finalroundai.com/blog/github-ceo-thomas-dohmke-w...

> Let’s face it: the candidates who want to work at Coinbase are as enthusiastic about AI as we are. They, like us, are optimistic about the future of this (and all) technology.

Yet Anthropic didn't want people to use AI as part of interviewing for them.

What does it mean to be lost? Why would a TODO comment not be lost, versus a comment without that prefix?

Previously known as Sublevel and Superthread.

Why?

Yes! In another comment of mine, that was the main thing I mentioned, haha.

edit: For those curious, https://youtu.be/51iONeETSng?t=3368.

- New theme inspired by Liquid Glass

- 24-bit colour

- Powerline fonts

I've tried all of them, including ones that yourself, and others, haven't mentioned like Rio. I stand by wanting Terminal.app simply updated with better colour support, then it's one less alternative program to get.

Will they ever update Terminal.app?

Do you have a trick for getting the images as well, as opposed to them being links to the remotely hosted?

I know it's not perhaps helpful, but I have the _exact_ same code, and it's worked for ages on macOS. Do other matches work correctly?

I have it in `~/.config/espanso/match/base.yml`.

Is that not true for any programming language?

Who says they are doing that?

The _instead_ was a key word in my comment. I didn’t say, or imply, they weren’t working on replacing other roles with AI.

This hyper-fixation on replacing engineers in writing code is hilarious, and dangerous, to me. Many people, even in tech companies, have no idea how software is built, maintained, and run.

I think instead we should focus on getting rid of managers and product owners.

This has annoyed me a few times, just recently a week ago. Thanks GitHub.

Another person has commented that you can do this, but it's a little known thing. git-spice automatically manages it for you too.

Like the author, I'd appreciate a stacked PRs approach, integrated with GitHub (unfortunately). E.g. `a → b → c → d` where I have PRs open for `b`, `c` and not yet on `d`, that are "linked" to the jj changes. So 1 change per PR or it could even be multiple. I've lately become a huge fan of git-spice, that just works.

It's maddening, considering their size, and that there are proven other examples out there of versioned change sets and divorcing the commit ID from the content ID.