672 karma · joined March 14, 2012
My biggest tip is to carefully back up every partition of the original firmware - there are many many seemingly identical variants and if you hose your particular baseband components you will lose your cellular functionality.
[1] https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Zhihe_series_LTE_dongles_...
>> “You don't want fascists benefiting from your code?”
> Then don't publish source.
> Background-check every user.
> Maintain a centralized approved-user registry.
> Monitor people's browsing.
> Use AI to detect unacceptable politics.
> Abolish encryption.
Seems like someone trying a reductio ad absurdum.
https://x.com/dhh/status/2097623347802587393?s=20
https://xcancel.com/dhh/status/2097623347802587393?s=20
DHH: "To that effect, I've also removed the plans/nix.md file from the current quattro branch. We're having some amazing discussions with nix experts about what the future can look like. But that's for Cinque (if at all). Right now we're ALL IN on shipping Omarchy Quattro RS 4.5 next!"
If I’m going to carry around an insanely fragile and expensive device I want to maximise screen area and aspect ratio.
They are fully funding the author of Hyprland for 3 years.
DDH offered to work with Arch and they refused.
* GTK interface is buggy on hyprland (could only click buttons when app was on its own screen and not set to fullscreen)
* docs are vibe slop and incorrect:
~ tether pair
[2026-08-30 11:33:26.084] [ERR] Unknown action. Run tether --help for options
~ tether --pair
[2026-08-30 11:33:29.949] [ERR] Pairing requires a TCP+TLS connection. Use --host to specify a target.
* installation requires sudo escalation to configure bluetooth settings with a vague warning but no real explanation of what the risks are.
* couldn't get it to reliably connect - the feedback from linux and ios apps were vague and didn't help with what was broken or what was required to fix it.
Promising project, I'd love a solution like this but not worth my time for now.
You have to appreciate the effort Apple puts into security - goes some way to understanding why they won't endorse/support installing an alternative operating system.
Made me yearn for a more heroic time.
They kept being thwarted by weather, clouds etc and eventually scientists worked out the theory could be easily proven by the red shift of stars by direct observation.
1) a few cents of components
2) the opportunity cost of selling you a high margin dongle
3) minus the risk of a lost sale if you buy a competitor
I wonder if further developing microg or similar would be a better use of resources than Postmarket, Ubuntu touch etc? Would that be a faster path to wider adoption and therefore better chance of challenging the Android/iOS duopoly?
* Introduced in Linux 2.6.39 in 2011
* patched in 7.1 (April 2026)
https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/chinas-cxmt-is-set-to-...
At current margins their capacity is going to commodity DRAM since their HBM process is not competitive. Will be interesting to see how it pans out
End users don’t need to replace screens, ports and batteries if there is reasonable cost parts and skilled labour available.
I’m happy with a trade off where a device has extreme miniaturisation and water resistance but needs someone with some surface mount soldering skill and the right tools to work on it.
Regardless, many (most?) phones hardware will last longer than the software running on it.
The article seems to refer to a 2023 Pixel Fold as one of their candidates - I guess a good opportunity if those fragile screens get damaged but not a cheap used device otherwise.
Even normal slab pixel devices have limited support for true android replacements like PostmarketOS let alone cheaper 3rd party devices usually running Mediatek/Exnos SOC that have zero open docs or support.