111 karma · joined October 3, 2019
I'm a home bicycle mechanic, and all manufacturers of bike components do this.
Seeing this, I could imagine birds using the strategy you describe.
I am one. I limit my personal carbon footprint. I do not own a car (and hopefully never will). I rarely eat meat. I live in a cheap, inefficient apartment because I'm living on a student income, but I keep the heat low to try to limit my energy consumption.
I probably won't have kids, because it wouldn't be consistent with my concerns about climate change to bring another high-consuming American into the world.
The stage 1 simulator, and integration & test facilities: https://twitter.com/blueorigin/status/1364968313047162880?s=...
"Tank Cleaning and Testing" facility: https://twitter.com/blueorigin/status/1364968720364429317?s=...
Launch Complex 36: https://twitter.com/blueorigin/status/1364969291746074628?s=...
It's exciting to see BO making progress on their campaign to catch SpaceX in the commercial launch space. I'm curious whether the slow, deliberative approach they show here will pay off in reliability, ability to scale, etc once they start putting kgs in orbit.
https://oxide.computer/podcast/on-the-metal-13-ken-shirriff/
It made for a fantastic introduction to real backcountry touring.
It's designed for use in a public policy context, so it works best with: - binary classification problems (ex: the evaluation module is designed for binary classification metrics) - problems that have a temporal component (the cross validation system makes some assumptions about this)
It’s so upsetting for me to read this that I’m feeling unable to articulate why.
Not to mention the fact that you’ve posted this in the context of a story where a child’s life was harmed by such a nonconsensual procedure.
That said, I watch progress on Starship with interest and optimism.
[1]https://www.defensedaily.com/developing-falcon-heavy-rocket-...
I hear a lot about the inconvenience of wired headphones, but as a daily user of wired headphones, that's not something I experience. And it certainly doesn't outweigh the costs (financial and environmental) of switching to Apple's disposable wireless headphones.
In short:
- Microfinance programs that grant small, low-interest loans aren't sustainable. Administering those programs (especially in developing countries) carries massive overhead that isn't offset by revenue from interest.
- Furthermore, there isn't strong evidence that low-interest loans actually improve their recipients' well-being on net (considering the harm that indebtedness can cause).
- Evidence (from randomly-controlled trials) shows that direct cash transfers are effective in improving recipients' well-being on a number of metrics, and that recipients do not spend them on "sin goods" like alcohol or tobacco[0].
[0] https://www.princeton.edu/haushofer/publications/Haushofer_S...
Low-demand, niche routes are necessary for a public transit system to work for its users. Sure, 80% of my trips might be on 2 or 3 routes. But without access to the handful of routes I ride the other 20% of the time, the system wouldn’t work for me, and I’d need a car to get around.
For example: when I take the bus later than ~9pm, I’m often one of just a few people riding it. But knowing I have the option to take the bus late at night is critical to the system feeling reliable. This allows me to live without a car.
Hopefully, this effect reduces congestion in my city, as more people are enabled to live low-car or car-free.
> I'm convinced it's a major reason they've been so successful.
I'd be interested to hear why you think this.
One guess I've got is that a high standard for writing is a filter for bad ideas - if you can't justify your idea in a tight, well-written document, then it's probably not worth trying out.