654 karma · joined August 12, 2011
You do, that's great, sincerely, I mostly agree with you, but I feel it lacks a bit of nuance. Adults should have control over how they interpret reality, but not everyone does, and some people want to use perceived offense (Oppression Olympics) as a means for some sort of change, even if it's just padding their wallet.
Some folks are immature, some folks have PTSD or some other condition and/or problem which makes it harder for them to have the discipline you have. Can we acknowledge both that words are interpreted by the listener, and that the listener might not be able to handle them?
I try to not be affected by things, why should I respect someone who's trying to insult me, and if I don't respect them why should I care at all about what they are saying? It boils down to self preservation ultimately I think. Ostracism might not be the death sentence it used to be, but it still can be seriously deleterious.
`Citizens United` was a mistake yes.
Complete anecdote, but you might find it useful.
I started running seriously about three years ago, now I run 10k almost everyday.
Being stronger (and in constant pain) has made me much more assertive.
Good luck proving that.
To name just a few.
I would say it does prevent some the spread of the virus, but does not completely prevent spread, and any one claiming that it did prevent all spread, should be removed from any position of authority.
https://www.vera.org/reimagining-prison-webumentary/the-past...
Whether this is true or not, it's certainly enraging.
Corporations are not the owners of the the internet.
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
It's quite simple.