654 karma · joined August 12, 2011
The government, does not own the country, it's not "their bar".
And even if they do, they don't automatically consent to all actions performed in their name.
The local or federal government do not have the right, or need to know the whereabouts of the average law abiding citizen. There is no "free" information, all information has a cost, whether it be acquisition or storage. Currently the people are taxed to oppress themselves. There is no choice not to be taxed, there is no consent.
Make it make sense.
I gravitate toward what I consider authenticate/consistent people which for me at least has seemed to work out as I also try to be that way.
> Can you have a linkhut profile...
It doesn't really work that way, you can see other peoples public conversations to see how they interact, as a metric for their personalities, which, might be more work. It's network effects moreso.
as for https://ln.ht, I can see it working for some people, but personally I think there's a bit too much going on, sensory overload.
you mean plagiarism?
this is correct, waves are a product of pressures, so, are emergent also, the real question is, where does the pressure originate
UK is still in the ECHR, so, not really, not yet
I was never talking about NYC, you assumed.
nice, exaggeration, and more misrepresentation, see ya
I don't see a difference, fundamentally it comes down to consent of the governed. If 51% of a country votes for something, and it doesn't happen, then what's the point in voting?
My point was about the degree of taxation.
come on