Capsaicin is a psychoactive substance
p.migdal.pl
p.migdal.pl
Hyperbole aside, it is interesting to see the sheer breadth in tolerance across friends and family. I'm far from a spice masochist, but I've never shied away from heat since my teenage years. What I find more interesting is the amount of stereotypical spice and heat avoidance I've seen from white family and friends; an example of which I recently heard from a friend, “I don't add spice to my chili, since I know some people don't like that.”
I'm genuinely confused by people who avoid adding additional flavour to their food. Heat avoidance I can understand to an extent, some folks are more sensitive to heat and pain sensations than others. But spice avoidance even from your garden variety spices genuinely befuddles me; and I can not understand how some people do not come across using things like Rosemary, Basil, or Cumin in their cooking.
I'll explain it to you :)
I think a lot of people cook how their parents cook. I taught my mom how to better season her cooking, to great success, but I don't blame her for not ever really learning. She learned from my grandma who spent her life on a tiny farm in the prairies, I'd be surprised if they came across cumin very often.
So, you grow up eating beef and vegetables seasoned with salt and pepper and homemade butter and eventually your palate doesn't really require the same stimulation and variety that people with access to more varied ingredients do. It's not that plain-eating-folks aren't aware there's more variety out there, but if they've spent their whole life _without_ those other options, it's just not something their body naturally want. As someone who appreciates music, it'd be easy for me to look down upon those with less developed palates, but to what end? People enjoy what they enjoy, I don't think there's any superiority to be had in liking basil just like there's no superiority to be had in liking djent.
I live in florida. There are people here that literally carry Sriracha sauce in their car. I will have people over for breakfast [eggs, bacon, toast, muffins], they will go to their car, and pour Sriracha sauce all over their eggs. It's pretty normal for them to put it on everything they eat. Eating just a potato seems strange to them, it needs that burning sensation. I think it is almost the opposite of a developed palate - it's more like they lost their ability to detect and enjoy simple flavors. Like an alcoholic that can't be in a social setting without liquor.
I think that's the keyword here. The behavior you're describing does sound very dependent, but those dependent on alcohol are a minority. I don't have numbers on capsaicin, but I'd be comfortable betting that the need to spice everything is also not the norm.
If taste and flavor preference is largely environmental as is argued, it makes sense that extremes exist on the edges.
You're already looking down on people who taste things differently than you do.
Someone else might acknowledge that increased complexity is typically an indicator of a later development stage, while preferring or finding moral goodness in an earlier stage of development, or having no value judgement on it at all.
Let's go with "people who've had less opportunity to try novel ingredients and flavors". Does that work for you rendaw?
>I'm genuinely confused by people who avoid adding additional flavour to their food.
I think there's a communication breakdown here. They're not saying they don't like flavorful food, they're saying they don't like spicy food. "Spicy" and "spice" are two different things, but are often used interchangeably by folk who aren't much into, or don't know much about, cooking. The comment your friend said should (I think, at least) be interpreted as, "I don't add spicy spices to my chili".
Now, I could be totally wrong, and you'll come back to confirm that your friend used absolutely no spices whatsoever, at which point... how does it even taste like chili? :)
EDIT: Cute anecdote; I have to use the word "seasoning" whenever cooking with my two year-old. If I say "spice", she immediately assumes it's gonna be "spicy" and begins to flip out lol.
Tastes delicious! But I learned a long time ago that it's an ingredient I need to avoid whenever I'm eating while on the run. Err, on the go.
On the flip side, I never understood the "coffee makes you poop" meme, but it's apparently a similar biological reality for a lot of people.
It's not a flavour, it's just pain. You can experience capsaicin on any mucuous membrane of your body. Your tongue and lips just happen to usually be the most convenient ones, but you're not using your taste buds on capsaicin.
Nothing wrong with enjoying painful food. I like exciting my pain neurons too. But not everyone likes pain, while far more people enjoy flavour.
It can, unfortunately, be an outlet for people who are dealing with some shit, and they might not realize it. Not saying that's what's up with OP, but I think it's why I've done it myself a time or two, despite usually being civil and open to a conversation.
Give them an ole "he who controls the spice, controls the universe!!"
Genetics? Who knows but they’re out there.
Either that or they think that food that tastes good is somehow bad/sinful or makes them feel out of control. Orthorexia is an example of this.
Now if you give me a piece of chicken, of course I will need a ton of spices to make it edible. Indians and the American south have found the best in my opinion (curry and cajun ftw).
Their free color catalog just came out last week: https://www.rareseeds.com/requestcat/catalog/
Carolina reapers: https://www.rareseeds.com/carolina-reaper-hot-pepper
I bought various chili types seeds in the past from them without any problems.
I wonder if we ever start to see application-specific biocomputing systems integrated into server farms, we might really start calling our servers "livestock".
Mildly OT, but reminds me of this iconic scene[0] from Roger & Me[1].
In some ways, (the movie[1], not the clip[0]) doesn't hold up too well. In others, it's still spot on IMHO.
In my memory she was an older woman; seeing it now, the woman looks so young.
Also TIL there is a follow-up short film called "Pets or Meat" https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-09-27-tv-24-sto...
I used to think I had no limits until I ate a Carolina Reaper whole. The pain in my mouth was tolerable, but it caused a stomach pain that felt like my gallbladder had returned, lasting for one absolutely hellish hour.
Checkout Mad Dog 357: https://maddog357.com/ it's the real deal.
Edit: I always presumed the high after spicy food was endorphins.
That was my assumption too.
I've had one experience with smelling a bowl that had some mexican style dish with habaneros over it. Just the smell made me salivate so much I could feel it in the back of my mouth as a pleasurable anticipation.
I watched him as he waited to intervene a few steps from us, platter in hand. Eventually he gave up.
In any case my experience, after 30 years of eating spicy food, is that I apparently don't feel the usual effects people who like spicy food do.
What happens instead is that the spice forces me to eat slower and thus get more flavour out of the dish. After all, "spicy" is technically not a flavour, so it mixes well with just about anything.
I did have a period of gradually increasing the dose, though, at the end of which I discovered that capsaicin is also excreted through urine. It is not a pleasant experience.
If you abstained for an extended period of time (6 months?) that Diablo pizza would probably blow your head off.
Many ie french are like this, they politely refuse going extreme re chilli, but once you get to fine tastes of that cuisine that would be completely gone you understand them. And join them, even as Indian/curry food lover
You sure it's the chillis? People's sense of taste also decreases significantly due to exposure to time (aging).
Thats interesting. It is the opposite for me. When I get hit by spicy/hot I start shoveling more and more food into my mouth to lessen the hurt. Somehow I find air hitting insides of my mouth after some super-spicy food more painful than more of the same spicy food :p. I couldn't figure it out.
Spicy IS the flavor, you're confusing Spicy food with Hot food.
I prefer the Spanish word "picante" - stingy. It stings, it causes pain. It's not a flavour like a spice would be.
Now, it is confusing, as spiced food is typically not spiced with capsaicin. Rather, spiced food has traditional spices and is often not spicy. (Think spiced rum. Not "hot" at all.)
This is why I get spicy alcoholic drinks.
The war on drugs is going about as well as Russia's war on Ukraine.
If we take a look at countries like Germany or the Netherlands we see a cat and mouse game where each parliament outlaws the latest psychedelics and then the psychedelic community unveils their new analogue or precursor. We can mark the years by small additions to the basic LSD molecule. We've gone from 1p-LSD and 1cp-LSD to 1V-LSD and now onto 1B-LSD. The stimulants and dissociatives communies seems to favour flouride, it's easy to and doesn't bind to much.
The UK law bans anything sold primarily for inducing psychotropic effects, while the scheduled substances sections at the end add very fair provisions for items commonly sold as food. That's why it's actually an exaggeration to say the law could affect the spicy food trade, as food trades are one of the explicit exemptions.
You may have misread, but this is not correct. The act claims to ban substances that are _only_ used for their psychoactive effect. From the act:
"The act only captures substances which are solely for human consumption for their psychoactive effects."
I'll agree it's a given the number one reason for the use of cannabis is to get high, whatever that means. That said, it's also inarguable that pain relief is a significant and not uncommon reason to use weed also. I worked in a community in south America where a group of south american Mormons (yes, the ones who don't drink coffee) grew cannabis to produce a tincture for the treatment of arthritis pain. Research seems to agree (there needs to be more, it's a new subject for modern research) that it's a useful substance in pain management.
The UK psychoactive law is non-scientific and inconsistent, which is unfortunately common. Alcohol and nicotine have real psychoactive effects, and both are sold only for their effects, yet they are legal. The difference is an established power base controls one and not the other.
Cannabis wouldn't fall under this law, you're right. It's not intended to cover cannabis though, as that is already legislated for by the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.
This law was designed to combat so-called designer drugs and it has been successful in eradicating British production of these items, which mostly now takes place in the Netherlands, Germany and China
Tobacco and alcohol are also covered along with foodstuffs in the Schedules. They have long standing cultural acceptance and importance. The government does what it can do combat misuse of alcohol through taxes (along with minimum pricing in Scotland) and to combat the use of tobacco products through taxation and packaging/advertising restrictions.
What would a scientific version of the law look like in your mind? What are the inconsistencies?
https://www.vera.org/reimagining-prison-webumentary/the-past...
Whether this is true or not, it's certainly enraging.
That is specific to the USA, where you lose a bunch of rights if you are a felon.
Looks like only a couple permanent-disenfranchisers.
> Any substance which—
(a) is ordinarily consumed as food, and
(b) does not contain a prohibited ingredient
> In this paragraph—
“food” includes drink;
“prohibited ingredient”, in relation to a substance, means any psychoactive substance—
(a) which is not naturally occurring in the substance, and
(b) the use of which in or on food is not authorised by an EU instrument.
So it sounds like Capsaicin produced naturally in things like hot peppers would be fine. But artificially produced Capsaicin added to food might not be.
To be psychoactive, capsaicin would need to warp your perceptions, rather than solely induce the sensation of burning pain.
I found additional sources going into the likely pharmacology of this effect:
> Namely, capsaicin and vanillin (and anandamide itself) are all agonists of the TRPV1 receptor, which stimulates production and release of endogenous anandamide. When mixed with N-linoleoylethanolamide and N-oleoylethanolamide from cacao, which inhibit anandamide breakdown, the levels of endogenous anandamide are augmented further. When breakdown of anandamide is inhibited pharmacologically or genetically, anandamide is able to produce a state of intoxication similar to tetrahydrocannabinol in rodents and nonhuman primates
Also, psilocybin is probably still scheduled explicity from before the law was passed.
Nutmeg is a deliriant on really high doses, and most deliriants are not controlled substances, though they may be classified as poisons. The reason is that tripping on deliriants is generally considered unpleasant, and enough to turn people off quickly.
Turns out there are a small number of actual anti-authoritarians who have always been consistent. And then there are countless hangers-on who proclaim to be an anti-authoritarian resistance when it suits them. It's funny, the fact people co-opt it shows that they see it as a noble and worthy ideology, yet it's still one they're happy to discard the minute some talking head put on TV by a corporation tells them to be outraged.
Are you one of the countless hangers-on who proclaim to be an anti-authoritarian resistance when it suits them?
Besides, my tomatoes are certified safe by Nutr-Alert and SafeCo. SafeCo even lets me doctor the lab results myself, for a little extra! I'm still in negotiation with PureFood, but I'm sure this little speedbump will be ironed out before you know it. Iron is good for you, anyway; they don't even test for that.
You made a really strong claim in the post I'm quoting, and suggested that you are among those hardcore anti-authoritarians whom you lionize. But this is a real(ish) world example of that belief being challenged, and instead of explaining your principled stance, you're playin' around; you suggested you had "hit a nerve". Ah, right, I guess I'm just too emotional. Gotta stand up for what's right! No, not like that.
Of course I'm being facetious about my leaden tomatoes, but so too are you, and other readers of these words should think about how the "anti-authoritarians" actually practice their claimed stances, and where they don't.
* good food
* alternating hyperventilation/slow breathing
* sex
* social interaction
* nervous breakdowns
We set up boundaries around what is "psychoactive" (like how some people do not consider alcohol to be a drug, or somehow different from other drugs), but fundamentally it's not like the brain isn't constantly drugging itself anyway. If your brain is not changing at all, how do you even experience something?
* putting your tongue on a battery
Yeah, it's a bizarre take
Asparagus makes your urine smell of fresh mown grass, except that mine doesn't, and I cannot detect that odour in another person's urine after they have ate asparagus. We... uh... ran some experiments to determine this. I theorized for a few years that this was a genetic thing, and sure enough, research published recently (in the past three years) bears this out.
My wife thinks that cilantro tastes of soap. And I theorized this is a genetic disposition. Research in the past few years bears this out. But cilantro to me, is a mild hallucinogenic and also a skin irritant. Which I theorized was a genetic response. And sure enough, in the past few years, research indicates that cilantro on certain people can act as an hallucinogenic. I have gained an appreciation for Mexican food more so of late.
Your theory is fact. https://flavourjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/20...
Here, we present the results of a genome-wide association study among 14,604 participants of European ancestry who reported whether cilantro tasted soapy, with replication in a distinct set of 11,851 participants who declared whether they liked cilantro. We find a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) significantly associated with soapy-taste detection that is confirmed in the cilantro preference group. This SNP, rs72921001 (p = 6.4 × 10−9, odds ratio 0.81 per A allele), lies within a cluster of olfactory receptor genes on chromosome 11. Among these olfactory receptor genes is OR6A2, which has a high binding specificity for several of the aldehydes that give cilantro its characteristic odor. We also estimate the heritability of cilantro soapy-taste detection in our cohort, showing that the heritability tagged by common SNPs is low, about 0.087.
I've never heard of someone having this kind of reaction to cilantro and find it fascinating.
I have independent verification by friends who are scientists and medical doctors at one gathering who have conducted observations that my pupils dilate, my eyes become bloodshot and, in the words of one observer, "I become more whoo-whoo. Whooo! Whoooooooo!" whatever that means. As my normal demeanour flips between "I don't want to be around people, you're all so tiring, I just want to be quiet" and a hyperactive Robin Williams amped up on caffeine and sugar, I am guessing I become even more "Whoooo! Whooooooooooooo! Let's par-tehhh!" I am probably over-compensating for something. The video recordings are cringeworthy.
We've done independent blind tests of "is this psychosomatic" or do I truly have a reaction. Multiple blind tests of a single subject (me) by multiple qualified observers over the course of several days do indeed bear out that I have an unintended reaction to cilantro, the oils from cilantro and the active ingredients in cilantro. Direct contact of the cilantro on my skin makes my skin itch and become red and bumpy. When I imbibe even small amounts of cilantro, no more than you would get in a standard serving with a meal, to me, it feels like I am drunk and whoozy for about 20 or so minutes before the effects pass. Again, to reiterate, I suspect my extreme reaction to cilantro is genetic and gives me a sensitivity and reaction that most of the population doesn't have, much like some of the population also detects cilantro tasting of soap. Though I suspect these are very different genetic markers.
Could be interesting (if so inclined) to try chewing on sprig of Thuja cedar - it has very high thujone content, so could confirm that thujone is the active chemical causing this effect.
You didn't mention any hallucinatory symptoms. If you eat cilantro before laying down in a dark room and closing your eyes, do you get hypnogogic imagery (dreamlike visualizations experienced before falling asleep)? I think thujone can promote that for me a bit, but I'm not very thujone sensitive.
I hadn't thought about thujone sensitivity being so variable between people: certainly an interesting lens to view the historical popularity of absinthe.
Thanks for the thorough reply!
Or, as they say in German, "es ist schön, wenn der Schmerz nachlässt" (it's great when the pain goes away). Then again, you also wouldn't intentionally hit your finger with a hammer to experience this feeling - so my approach to spicy food is "know your limit": I enjoy it in moderate amounts, but keep away from the kind of spicyness where after a few bites you feel like your mouth is on fire and you can't taste the food anymore...
This actually sounds related to some of the reasoning behind "cutting" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-harm#Pathophysiology
These can be mistaken occasionally - as in the Rabbi and the goat joke/parable. But in most cases, it is clear if a state would be desirable if there were no discomfort before. (As a side note, it is why I am skeptical about people praising the Kambo ceremony - taking a frog poison.)
Ad hammer - I mention that in another blog post (curious if you refer to this or if it is a nice coincidence). In any case, there is a difference if something is only a temporary discomfort or causes long-term harm. Instead of using a hammer, one can get spanked or (safely) flogged.
> "I like to hit my head with a hammer,"
> Said Johnny one day to his pop.
> "The reason I like to do it," he said,
> "Is, it feels so good when I stop!"
True, the capsaicin itself doesn't harm your body, but the pain can in itself cause some slight damage (and like any drug, an overdose of capsaicin can be very dangerous).
I’ve also heard of folks having esophageal tears due to severe vomiting.
All ‘reactions to’, not ‘reactions from’ I guess?
That said, capsaicin is recognized as a chemical agent used in warfare, and having been through some training, it does suck to be sprayed.
To enjoy Capsaicin as a stimulant mix copious amounts of the powdered red pepper with honey. Taking it for a few days screws up my stomach though.
No, it cannot.
> The most common causes of peptic ulcers are infection with the bacterium Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin IB, others) and naproxen sodium (Aleve). Stress and spicy foods do not cause peptic ulcers.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/peptic-ulcer/...
It's really quite tragic.
https://honeysucklemag.com/smokin-ed-currie-peppers-addictio...
I love chilli, and have ever since I was a kid. I don't particularly enjoy novelty heat levels though, it's got to complement the food your eating in a balanced way. I find the Ghost/Bhut Jolokia to basically be on the good side of that threshold, anything over a Ghost I find is simply too overpowering.
*Edit: My mouth is now watering!!*
Next three days I was like a zombie - heart racing even sitting still, cotton-mouth, trouble stringing words together. Along with galloping shame and self-loathing.
To this day my friends give me shit me about it, whenever nutmeg is mentioned. I count myself lucky that it wasn't worse and that I still have friends from that time.
Vanillin does the same thing. So does dancing and some forms of yoga.
But foods like cacao (or significantly dark chocolate) directly contain anandamides which cause euphoria.
Cacao also has re-uptake inhibitors that make the euphoric feeling last a lot longer. This is why ancient civilisations like the Olmecs, Aztecs, and Mayans would mix drinks of cacao, vanilla, and capsaicin. And modern Mexican chocolate often mixes in pepper. Without Cacao the anandamide induced euphoria is very short lived.
Seems like if it's just about the ability to trigger a signal at the peripheral side of some sensory nerves, that's quite a bit of stretch to "psychoactive substance", to the point that the same argument applies to e.g. photons.
For instance I've found that making a strong tea from rosemary brings a calm, meditative, and sometimes quite giggly mood.
Thyme contains large doses of myrcene, which has some gabaergic(iirc) effects.
And as a hallucinogen it's a deliriant which means you could literally run into traffic thinking you're taking a stroll through a beautiful forest(this is an actual deliriant trip report that exists btw, though the drug was datura).
It's not even hot in the normal sense. It doesn't burn your mouth. But swallow an eyedropper of it, and you are in for an hour long ordeal. Milk and water does nothing. Your entire body will tingle and sweat, and you will feel confused and disoriented like a high dosage of antihistamines. It completely changed my conception of what capsaicin can do to you.
To put that into context, Fox Labs One Point Four - a pepper spray popular with police - is 4% oleoresin capsicum.
That's not a hot sauce; that's pepper spray concentrate.
The sayings from previous generations are more spice = more anger. I wonder if that's related.
Can anyone confirm or deny this? The internet seems to agree. It still seems crazy to me.
In fact I believe the only nightshade used as food in the old-word was the Eggplant, with potatoes and tomatoes also being new-world.
So prior to 1492, there was no tomato in Italian food and no chili in Thai food.
Old-world food was a hell of a lot more boring before the Columbian exchange. It transformed food so much that most of what we think of as "traditional" cuisines in various old-world countries or regions are largely products of the 16th century or later.
The exchange also cut the rate and severity of previously-regular famines dramatically, enabling a huge population boom and economic expansion (see: Mann's 1493). Mainly due to maize and potatoes, maize being incredibly efficient on a calories-per-acre basis, and potatoes being stupid-easy to grow almost anywhere, having decent caloric content and not-bad nutrient profile (gotta eat the skin, though) and being easy to store for the medium-term to cover gaps when other crops fail (you just... leave them in the ground)
Turnips. It was mostly wheat, barley, and rice with a side of turnips. Not the modern turnip that’s been through 20th century breeding for some semblance of flavor, mind, but an “heirloom” variety that is even more boring than turnips are now. The only flavor worth mentioning was in the leafy parts.
Allyl isothiocyanateallyl isothiocyanateAllyl isothiocyanate (AITC) is the organosulfur compound with the formula CH2CHCH2NCS that gives horseradish its unique flavor.
What else could be the conclusion?
I'm waiting for it and will say 'told you so!'.