1,349 karma · joined July 9, 2008
We're trading you the prizes for a commercial license.
As of July, they apparently have 40m. Cool.
Sourceforge and Rubyforge both provide similar services. This is nothing new.
It's also for hosting static blogs: http://tom.preston-werner.com/
It's also for hosting personal sites: http://defunkt.github.com/
I love seeing creative uses of Pages. If we spent all our time worrying "what if," we wouldn't have a brand to dilute nor a team's attention to divert.
Have not noticed the same with my 3GS.
{ json: [ my stuff... ]}
Isn't that sufficient? Use that when returning sensitive data, just normal arrays when not dealing with sensitive info.`latest` or `rip-latest` or some such?
I feel your pain. That's where it all began.
It's not the most simple problem and I was limited during development to my own setup and the setup of a few peers.
I'd love to get it rock solid and take it where it needs to go.
Gem publishing is opt-in. Even for forks.
We'd love to take what we've learned serving Rubygems and apply the knowledge to any other languages that have a solid packaging system.
If your project includes both Ruby and Perl, Ruby and Perl each get a +1.
e.g. in Safari:
var a = { new: 'Monkey' }
fails. Thus the required quotes in the JSON spec.
This is why the author information is retained and --signoff is used.
As Hongli Lai says in the comments: Most of the time, people who fork my projects make a bunch of changes, some which I want and some which I do not want. Cherry-picking instead of pulling totally makes sense in these situations.
This is the situation it was designed for - reviewing and signing off on individual commits, not merging branches.
I think the takeaway from this article is that we need to do a better job explaining the feature and what it's for. I understand now how someone new to the site would have no concept of email patch management or git cherry-pick and assume this is a nice interface for `git merge`.
As a first step, I've improved the text in the help dialogue to be more clear and link to the blog post + intro video more prominently. Maybe a next step would be making the actual help link itself (it's a small question mark next to Your <project> Fork Queue) more visible.
Also we could detect if it was your first time using the Fork Queue and offer help - that seems to be a popular idiom for web apps these days.
Perhaps in the future we can even offer a first class merge tool as the author suggests, but for now I've been extremely happy with how the Fork Queue compliments (but doesn't replace) my offline workflow.
edit: To elaborate, we view the growth of DVCS in general as a good thing. (Also we have a big surprise coming soon for hg users.)