Some might even say it is better to mostly ship HTML with minimal JS.
ducks
2,117 karma · joined July 20, 2011
Some might even say it is better to mostly ship HTML with minimal JS.
ducks
This project looks to alleviate a lot of these problems.
It'd be great to be able to register webhooks so that it could send events to external systems. Ideally I'd like to know when a file is created/deleted etc without having to walk directories on the sftp server on a regular basis.
Chasing (relative) peanuts is still a better call for most.
We can hire top talent for our given price range without geographic restriction, save on costs (no desk, office, etc), and retain the employee longer.
There are downsides, but they're 95% managerial issues.
This particular site seems to be a marketing piece for TripleByte. Perhaps the makers can comment on the accuracy of the data?
Solo entrepreneur full-rewrites are almost always churn inducing, feature stagnation, time sucks.
I'd advocate working on improvements to the current platform, one-by-one. Focus on features that increase your bottom line until you're at a MRR where losing 30% of your customers will be worth the cost of improvements.
- Remote work
- Ability to contribute to "moving the needle"
- Profitable, which probably means decent pay
However, I've walked away from interview processes that require a work sample that'll take more than a few hours or require lots of domain knowledge to get started. It just isn't worth my time, especially as a barrier to entry before talking to anyone.
Things I am happy to do to see if I'm a good fit:
- Pair with a developer on the team. I learn just as much about the team I'd be joining as the hiring company does about me. - Talking through code that I've written, talking through how I came to the implementation and how I might refactor/enhance further. You can't really bullshit this without the interviewer being a nit.
Things I'll do as a 1099: - Fix a real bug - Refactor real code - Do a project that isn't trivial, start to finish
...but as normal user of email, I appreciate a heavy hand when it comes to email lists which mailchimp deems malicious or bad for its ecosystem. It's no secret that mailchimp maintains a high standard for the quality of lists and email it delivers. The common thread in these stories seems to be malicious actors, poor/spammy content, etc. So I'm not sure it's so bad?
Has anyone with a "typical" (e-commerce shop, saas newsletter, etc) mailchimp list been shutdown without notice?
I want Plaid to succeed and I want to use those products, but beware of building something on top of Plaid; you may be driving customers away.
70 years of "put every fire out" has resulted in forests with excess fuel. That coupled with dry spells and warmer temps = a powder keg instead of natural burns.
Less fuel = less intense fire = more likely to control.
This is such a short sighted perspective that it's laughable.
Good management will see that the candidate is thinking about joining the team as a long-term commitment and isn't just making a job change for a pay increase over their last/current role. It shows that candidate is showing up for the same reason the company exists -- to be fairly compensated for services rendered.
A leadership team that laughs at these questions are going to lose long-term, and should be avoided by potential employees and VC alike.
Edit: grammarz
> make it known
This was the hardest "part" of working in a company for me to understand and execute on, especially when reporting to a non-technical supervisor. The thing is they simply don't know where to look or what to lookout for to give us accolades. It isn't as hard as we make it out to be, either. It can be as simple as "I made the common components for the WidgetMaker uniform through out the system, increasing reliability and improving maintainability. This will help us avoid an outage during peak WidgetMaking season so we can continue to make Widgets and operate smoothly", which isn't at all horn-tooty, but gives credit where due.