But for me, the obvious reason to attend is to network with other developers. Whether your company sees that as useful or not will probably determine if they spring for it.
1,614 karma · joined April 14, 2010
But for me, the obvious reason to attend is to network with other developers. Whether your company sees that as useful or not will probably determine if they spring for it.
Entrepreneurs conference? Can't build that start up on your own. Sales conference? You'd be derelict in your duties if you are not networking over every possible shill you can.
But programmers? Well. We're just expected to glom into some dark corner and crank out code, right?
How would "the blockchain" anonymise anything? Isn't it the opposite, if all transactions are transparent?
[0] https://seekingalpha.com/article/73533-mcdonalds-is-a-real-e...
On my first attempt I agreed to a prompt to download updates to the installer; it then told me I needed to have a key to continue.
So I started again without downloading the updates, and I could install and activate without a key.
In my experience, unit tests don't catch many bugs when the code is fresh. But when it's five years old with many modifications over the code base, some dumb little test that you thought was a waste of time is now alerting you to what would have been a horror regression.
In other words: Even though it feels like it's slowing you down now, if you write tests while the functionality is still fresh in your mind, and you capture your assertions well, they'll pay off dividends in the future once you've forgotten what some block of code does.
Naming the test just "initialise" is not very useful as it doesn't assert what you expect the method under test to do. Given that the purpose of the initialise function is to populate a watchlists collection variable from the parameter, i'd name the test something like "initialise_daoRecordCountIs9_watchlistCountIs9". The pattern I generally use is <method_name>_<assertion_under_test>_<expected_result>.
Then, my test would be the following:
* Set up / mock the dao parameter to have 9 rows
* Create an instance of the class under test and push in the dao parameter
* Verify / Assert that the class under test now has 9 items in the watchlists variable - I'm assuming there is a public method to access that.
I'm yet to try it out, but I wonder if the problems with editing files in the linux filesystem[0] is going to be an issue with this?
[0]: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/commandline/2016/11/17/do-n...
I think the reason the online music subscriptions have done so well is that their catalogs span multiple publishers, and customers really don't want to subscribe to multiple services. While there's minor differences, you pretty much can get access to any music you can think of.
Otherwise you just end up with some crummy bundling service where you pay a premium for a few things you are interested in, and waste money on the rest of the junk.
It changes everything.
It won't matter if a large percentage of jobs have been automated. The ones that haven't will go up in demand with every habitable planet that is settled.
But I'm still not convinced that we understand Aphantasia completely. I think there's a whole spectrum of different conditions in visualisation and everyone has different skills and abilities. Here's mine:
- I can currently recall just under 1000 Kanji
- The learning system I am using (wanikani) doesn't require me to, but from previous study I can write a few hundred
- I can easily recognize people's faces from memory ("never forget a face")
- But if you asked me to draw a face from memory I'd have a very hard time
- I can visualize geometric figures in my mind's eye and move them around
- As a long time software developer I can effortlessly deconstruct a complex system into base abstractions, hold these in memory, and manipulate/recall the constructs in my head
- I get a very abstracted visualisation when reading fiction. Lengthy overwrought descriptions bore me and I throw away most of it anyway, so I tend to favour Charles Bukowski over Dan Brown
- My imagination is similiar, I can set up basic scenes but I can't "see" the detail in any way like looking at a photograph
- My art skills are decent but I'm not working off any kind of internal image. I think of the main points I want to express but I don't know exactly how they'll look until I commit them to paper/pixel
- Sometimes when I'm really tired I have very short (under one second) open eye hallucinations where I do visualize random things in extreme detail, indistinguishable from reality.
- I have visual dreams that feel as accurate as reality
- I have sporadic occasions when I (start to) lucid dream. Before I'm lucid, everything in the dream is vivid, but once I become aware then all the detail of the dream unravels and I wake up shortly after
While this is excellent snark and a great witty rejoinder to internet arguments, there is something underlying which I think is useful: Figuring it out yourself is commendable, but no-one's going to mind if you look for some expert advice from time to time.
The tablet would have doomed itself by being too user friendly.
At the risk of wandering even more off topic, it's pretty dispiriting when you see the leaders of the pixel art community with 20k+ followers begging to do a commission for for 25 bucks.
That's not my definition of success.
I've been studying Japanese for years and I am at a basic intermediate level. I still find grammar hard to read, and even harder to produce naturally. I may just be particularly thick but I think saying "you can master Japanese grammar in a matter of weeks" is pretty misleading.
[0] http://www.learn-japanese-adventure.com/japanese-conditional...
But it kinda does justify the view that they are bungling this release if they have stock left on shelves in those countries while those in US / Japan (where I am) can only resort to buying in secondary markets.
I get that they're a typical conservative Japanese company, they don't want to screw up inventory, blah blah blah, but it's getting annoying.
And slightly off topic, does anyone know what is up with the NES classic / Famicom mini? As far as I can tell that thing never restocked after launch.
You can see how it looks like Nintendo is majorly shooting themselves in the foot with these slow launches.
1. Keeping up with family via Facebook
2. Getting an AFL streaming subscription
If you're not Australian it's hard to understand, but once you've experienced the greatest sport in the world it's hard to give it up.I wouldn't use Japan as your data point to champion programming as accessible to the common man. One only needs to suffer through a few domestic websites to know that talent is sorely missing.
Pay peanuts, get monkeys, etc.
I've been using both Mac and Windows OSes since the last millennium, so I'm not precious about either one. But I do personally prefer explorer over finder in most aspects.
Visual Studio is a beast, and it's absolutely ridiculous that MS now give away so many features for free in the community version.
I had no expectations for the type cover keyboard, but it turns out it is fantastically comfortable and productive.
I have no plans to get a new Mac, but my 2014 MBP is still proving useful to do remote iOS builds from Xamarin. I'll probably keep it around just for that but if I never have to open Xcode again it will be too soon.
Introducing OS X as the mobile Unix platform of choice on top of the first ever drop dead gorgeous notebook (The Powerbook G4 Titanium) declared Apple as the platform for discerning power users. Those power users could confidently brag about their systems, giving free advertising to non-power users. The halo effect of which can still be seen today, trickling down to Joe Coffee in your local cafe. How much longer that lasts in the wake of mis-steps like the touch bar is questionable though, even in the wake of massive unit sales to the broader public.
This article is about high end video / graphics users, and workstations are a slightly different use case. But not much. Once these users move off Mac, who is going to be left to champion the desktops?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casio_F-91W
Keeps better time than a Rolex, and is a fraction of the price. Waterproof. Has an alarm, stopwatch, and timer; all things missing from traditional wind ups. Interface is easy to use and discover. The battery last almost forever.
Now, if you're asking if it's aesthetically pleasing, that's a different story. But we were talking about design, right?
EDIT: Wikipedia says they're only splash proof; I used to swim with mine but there you go. And I'm making up the timer function, that must have been on later models only.
My advice (which is free internet advice, so take that for all it's worth) is that this is holding you back. As long as you don't see yourself as a fraud, it doesn't matter if someone else calls you one.
And, now I've done diagnosing you, I'll now assume you're in the exact same situation as I was (which is even worse internet advice, so prepare to pile up some massive grains of salt)
Because it wasn't that long ago, I remember the first time a project of mine got the focused attention of the HN front page. I was very nearly physically ill, because I was sure I was going to be judged harshly by some internet rando.
And yes, eventually someone did claim that my project was lame / worthless / something else equally stinging, and yes, it did hurt my feelings for a while.
But then I realised that I didn't care what they thought. I'd finished my project to (generally) good acclaim and they were just some bitter armchair expert who felt they had to chip in.
The good news is that it's easily solved, you need a tougher skin. The bad news is the only way you can do that is by putting stuff out there, failing, and then doing it all again :)
Because I am really sick of Google serving me ads for stuff I recently searched for and subsequently bought.
Being a very occasional social smoker who should probably quit anyway it hasn't bothered me, but I did find it just a bit ludicrous when I tried to buy a pack at Safeway. The exchange went something like this:
me: Give me a pack of Peter Stuyvesants, ah, um, I think the light ones in the blue colored pack.
staff: They don't have colors anymore. We can't show you the packet. You have to tell us which ones.
me: Really? Ok, fine. Well, just give me the 8mg low tar ones, whatever they're called.
staff: They don't have mg measures on the packets any more.
me: So how do I know which ones are the light ones?
staff: You just have to know.
I eventually picked one of the packs at random. Not what I'd call the best harm minimisation strategy.5 one star reviews out of 100,000 known installs is very different to 5 out of 10.
I wish that the app review had stats for 1/2/3/4/5 star ratings as percentages of the known user base.
Anything similiar for Azure? I would really like to understand the difference between the different types of app services, and especially how they relate to the project templates in Visual Studio.
finders (sales - those that bring in the $$$) = customer machine
minders (admin, finance, hr, etc) = company machine
grinders (the grunts who actually do the work - for a tech company this is the engineering dept) = product machineIt's a pretty simple exercise to map this to the three machines.