A very successful company with some of the happiest customers I’ve ever seen, whose entire product was a SAP hack that allowed people to enter their data using Excel. As someone unfamiliar with SAP, absolutely blew my mind.
2,877 karma · joined March 24, 2008
A very successful company with some of the happiest customers I’ve ever seen, whose entire product was a SAP hack that allowed people to enter their data using Excel. As someone unfamiliar with SAP, absolutely blew my mind.
Strongly agree with your sentiment around maps: most people can’t read them, they color the entire workflow and make it more complex, and (imo) lead to a general undervaluing of the geospatial field. Getting the data into columns means it’s usable by every department.
Getting started from 0 with geo can be difficult for those unfamiliar. DuckDB packages everything into one line with one dependency.
Yeah, I feel old.
QGIS is amazing. It's really great. It also came out in 2002, so I think the headline is safe.
Docker has been a big improvement (when I was first learning PostGIS, the amount of time I had to hunt for proj directories or compile software just to install the plugin was a major hurdle), but it's many steps away from:
``` $ duckdb D install spatial; ```
(Geopandas is great, too.)
Yes, there are so many great tools to handle the complexity for the capital-G Geospatial work.
I love Felt too! Sam and team have built a great platform. But lots of times a map isn't needed; an analyst just needs it as a column.
PostGIS is also excellent! But having to start up a database server to work with data doesn't lend itself to casual usage.
The beauty of DuckDB is that it's there in a moment and in reach for data generalists.
I have a similar function built into my app, which takes the proposed name for a checklist and description and uses it to generate steps. Have heard many use it for executive function management: https://steplist.app
When You Want Out of Your Contract w/ Microsoft: "My guess is we will hit AGI sooner than most people in the world think and it matter much less."
I disagree that it was "fine" because the people who were respected and held up as prime examples of Googlers – for decades – almost always had nothing to do with the ads business. This sends a signal to the rest that the ads business doesn't really matter, it's not the important work, it's akin to the janitorial work that has to happen so the rest of us can work here. If you do that long enough you end up with people optimizing towards things that aren't aligned with the needs of the business. It was on autopilot, relatively, compared to other areas.
Google's culture wasn't a problem – and maybe a good thing! – when you had a gigantic money printer working in the background, paying for everything. But it was there, ready to be a problem once times got tough.
I found the exercise of listing the app and creating the content for the listing a worthwhile exercise, but nothing else about the experience worthwhile.
Every day its listings are filled with redundant apps, template shovelware, wrappers around AI APIs, and random non-app content (think ebooks, blog posts, courses, etc.) Very occasionally you'll find a useful utility or two by a independent team (but you gotta scroll wayyy down). PH has completely failed to defend their ranking algorithms against spam and brigading.
I'd imagine a one contributing factor is fixing the ridiculously buggy Mark 14 torpedo, which cleared up right about that time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_14_torpedo
Here's a great video on it: https://youtu.be/eQ5Ru7Zu_1I?si=_1ujGsLQumraKz1Q
Altman's outreach, his tweet, and the thousands of tweets and comments talking about how similar Sky is to ScarJo is enough to win the case in California.