167 karma · joined June 17, 2010
So it is more the opposite of specific than objective. I think your confusion comes from colleges using holistic to mean they looks at things beyond beyond objective measurements like test scores and GPA
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transtheoretical_model [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivational_interviewing
For those who qualify for Social Security the minimum benefit for 2024 is $50.90/mo (10 yrs of work) and $1,066.50 for 30 years of work [1].
In the US from 1964 to 1997 you could upgrade your home (i.e., buy one equal or more expensive) and avoid capital gains taxes and after age 55, you could downsize once and not pay capital gains taxes.
From 1997, we've had the current regime of $250K/single, $500K/couple exclusion if you lived there 2 of the previous 5 years from the sale.
They had no problems reintegrating into regular school when they chose to do so. Our youngest stayed on the homeschool track the longest (from 7th grade because they got involved in competitive Call of Duty. So they ended up doing the homeschool->community college->GaTech track.
> But it boggles my mind how people can assume, with a straight face, that they are equipped to educate their child alone - something which is normally a profession for which you have to study O(years) (and even then most people aren’t really good at). What gives parents this confidence? And what gives parents the right to squander the future of their children on a whim?
There are awesome resources to educate you kid on just about anything. The real distinguishing attribute on whether a parent can be a good educator is whether their children can spin them up emotionally. If a parent can't stay calm when their child is pushing their buttons homeschooling probably won't work. And then secondarily, a parent should know when they are over their head and need to bring in assistance. Not every parent is equipped to help their children learn calculus and other advanced courses.
[1] - https://www.staradvertiser.com/2012/02/16/breaking-news/hawa...
This mostly solves the retail/wholesale/base rate problem.
[1] - https://www.ftb.ca.gov/file/business/industries/worker-class...
[1]: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2018/08/homeownership...
After grad school my first job involved building the equivalent of the WOPR (WarGames ref). The AI was written in lisp, the interface was written in C++ using Interviews/X-Windows, all the simulations were written in Fortran and ADA was used to glue all the pieces together. Except for the simulation code it was all written by a team of 3 of us.
Greenfield projects were truly greenfield. You had to invent almost everything you needed. If you wanted a dictionary data structure you built it yourself. Over the network communication meant having to develop your own TCP/UDP protocols. Imagine doing leetcode problems in C++ without any libraries or templates.
Memory bugs were the bane of your existence. There were almost no tooling for debugging other than gdb. Testing was very manual and regressions were common. Source control was originally at the file level with SCCS/RCS and when CVS came out it was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Death marches were sometimes a thing. I remember one 6 week period of 90 hours a week. While it wasn't healthy, it was easy because we were exploring new frontiers and every day was a dopamine rush. You had to fight with yourself to maintain a decent WLB.
Like now, there were always battles around what new technology would be the winner. For example in networking we had Ethernet, token ring, fddi, appletalk, netware and a few others all vying to become the standard.
Working from home meant dialup into a command line environment. So every developer knew how to use vi or emacs or both.
The biggest difference today is you stand on top of all this technology and processes which have matured over the years. This means a developer today is MUCH more powerful. But if they didn't live through it, much of that mature technology and processes are just a given without deep understanding, which most of the time is fine, but once in while can be a problem.
In the lower grades, the biggest issue is the parent/child dynamics. When things are going badly, do they spin each other up or can the parent keep things calm. If you spin each other up, homeschool is not for you.
In the higher grades, parents need to know their limitations and bring in experts when needed.
Personally, I adored homeschooling my children.
https://katherinejacobs.bandcamp.com/album/the-ocean-single
https://katherinejacobs.bandcamp.com/album/youre-gonna-regre...
Each island is also its own isolated electric grid, so reliability is not great and shifting renewables to other islands isn't possible currently. Unfortunately, the ocean is deep between the islands and connecting them would probably cost close to a billion dollars all in. A bit of a stretch for our small state.