1,765 karma · joined May 9, 2011
https://notbad.software
I believe there’s still some AI based visual monitoring in place but it’s much simpler. Instead of needing to identify exactly what you’re picking up, it just needs to flag when it thinks you might have picked something up without scanning it. If that happens, it triggers a staff member to come have look in your bags when you scan your receipt to leave.
It seems like a much more pragmatic way to realise 80% of the value you get with “just walk out”.
’’’ + if time.Now().Month() == time.February && time.Now().Day() == 29 { + t.SkipNow() + } ’’’
Fixed.
I wash mine around once a snow season. Or sooner if I’ve gone on a really dirty summer hike. If the pores of the fabric get clogged with dirt it doesn’t repel water as well.
Wash the jacket, then give it a gentle tumble dry. This warms and reflows the DWR coating. If it isn’t beading and shedding water after this, consider re-applying a DWR. I like nikwax, I find it effective and it’s less horrible than the aerosol ones.
> That is because devices are increasingly able to withstand getting wet.
> All Apple devices from the iPhone 12 onwards are able to withstand immersion up to a depth of six metres, for up to half an hour.
> But with cost-of-living pressures driving growth in the global second-hand mobile market, it is likely that many people will need advice on what to do - and what not to - with a soggy smartphone for some time yet.
Fire is definitely part of many ecosystems. Fire every ten years in a sclerophyll forest? Great! Fire in a rainforest during a bad drought? It’s gone now. Might come back after the next ice age.
Also, “forest” environments that have been clear felled and replaced with a monocrop at some point basically have to be managed thereafter. Any properly bad fire through there will leave the ground essentially sterile. Seed bank destroyed. Still black years later. Their natural resilience is gone and it’s our responsibility to manage the fire ecology while they rehabilitate in the same way we need to manage the flora back to something healthier.
And then of course, anywhere we’ve built human stuff on the interface. We either defend it or we resign ourselves to the people who live there being homeless after the next fire. Leaving aside whether that’s right or wrong, it’s a very different social pact than the one we’ve operated under so far. Any change to that is going to be generational rather than short term.
A thermal imaging camera can be handy to find the hot spots. Especially if you can get on the fireground overnight.
Mainly, though, you just need to watch peaty areas carefully until you’re sure they’re done and dusted. Regular patrols, especially ahead of a bad weather change.
Australian peat is very different to Canadian peat, though. Canada is wetter and colder, making this kind of overwintering possible. Here peat fires can smoulder for up to a few weeks, but they’ll either blow back up once it gets dry enough or go out once it rains enough. We never get that protective snow layer that keeps the fire dry but cool for months on end.
I haven’t been over but a couple of mates went last year. The part of Canada they were working has a deep peat/duff layer above permafrost. All the trees are rooted only in the duff so when the fire rolls through, it burns out all the root balls and suddenly every tree is a widowmaker.
Also Canada has reliable flowing water from snowmelt, so their tactics are focused on high pressure pumps and multi-km hose lays. Totally alien to the dry firefighting tactics we use in remote area work here in Aus.
To be clear, not trying to say one is superior to the other. I don’t have any experience with, or specific training in, the US method.
Instead, we tend to stay low and manage the overpressure layer with gas cooling. Short bursts from firefighting nozzles that use a spinning element to atomise the spray. These rapidly turn to steam, pulling heat out of the room with the expansion. Precision is very important as too much water or insufficient atomisation will create a sauna, lowering the survivability of the compartment.
The parent post said (emphasis mine):
> While everything was *TLS* encrypted between all conversation participants and the Snapchat server
To which you replied:
> Snapchat *does not encrypt* text messages only photos and video.
Which isn't true. TLS is encryption, and provides effective protection against an MITM attack from the provider of the Gatwick airport wifi. Sure, E2EE encryption may provide better privacy. It's only providing a meaningful improvement against a certain group of adversaries, though. That's the set of attackers who have the resources to defeat TLS, even without public key pinning, yet who do not have the resources to compromise/keylog one or more of the devices or compel cooperation from Snapchat.
Even if Snapchat did E2EE their messages, you would be very unlikely to have certainty that _your_ messages were secure. All it takes is `shouldE2EE := username != 'dogma1137'`. Or more likely `shouldCCTheNSA := username == 'dogma1137'`. The only defence against that kind of coerced cooperation is a full source code audit, confidence that there's no obfuscated code fooling your auditor, reproducible builds of the app, an ongoing assurance of some kind that the installed build's checksum matches that of the audited code, and finally full and ongoing confidence that none of the other vendors involved in the production of your device from the OS software stack right down to the baseband chip, have been similarly coerced.
tl:dr, TLS is probably all you need. For the cases where TLS legitimately isn't sufficient, you should be assuming that any conversation within 100m of any electronic device has been compromised.
TLS prevents the people who run Gatwick airport wifi from reading the messages. E2EE would also do that, and would additionally prevent Snapchat themselves from reading the messages.
The lack of E2EE does not imply a lack of TLS.
Being able to quickly squirt all of that, including photos, to another crew is a literal lifesaver.
AFAIK the only way to programatically obtain bom data is the awful ftp endpoint.
Sometimes that incentive is financial. Sometimes it’s prestige through points, votes or badges. Sometimes it’s power through moderation rights. What’s yours?
The much larger F150 shown here can only be had by first importing from the US and then converting locally to right hand drive. The associated engineering certificates and approvals are non-trivia. By that point they’ve picked up the luxury car tax due to the costs involved. They also attract a higher registration/CTP fee due to weight and risk.
So, they’re actually heavily disincentivised by taxes and policy. That’s before you even look at the cost to comprehensively insure. Very steep due to the substantial repair costs driven by parts availability.
Explicitly trying not to pile on the “let me tell you how to manage your notifications” train by the way! That’s up to you and yours. Just nerding out on smartwatches.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/message-threading-thund...
If you or some subset of your workforce has a suboptimal home situation, look at arranging individual coworking spaces. Everyone can shorten their commute by picking whichever space is conveniently located. You also sidestep the challenges of having some team members collocates while others are remote.
It’s not legislated. The battery gear is just simpler and more reliable. And the fact it’s quieter is a bonus.